West and North West · Region (SA4)

Walkability in West and North West

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

Far fewer homes are within a short stroll of a park in West and North West compared to the rest of the state. This region is considered somewhat walkable, with about half of all homes having a 15-minute walk to a variety of local services.

Open map →
📍 West and North West, Region (SA4)

Where West and North West sits — Walkability score

4.3 Somewhat walkable
  • 0.0–0.4: 2 areas
  • 0.4–0.7: 0 areas
  • 0.7–1.1: 0 areas
  • 1.1–1.4: 0 areas
  • 1.4–1.8: 0 areas
  • 1.8–2.1: 1 area
  • 2.1–2.5: 1 area
  • 2.5–2.9: 3 areas
  • 2.9–3.2: 4 areas
  • 3.2–3.6: 1 area
  • 3.6–3.9: 6 areas
  • 3.9–4.3: 13 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 9 areas
  • 4.6–5.0: 7 areas
  • 5.0–5.4: 2 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 6 areas
  • 5.7–6.1: 9 areas
  • 6.1–6.4: 6 areas
  • 6.4–6.8: 2 areas
  • 6.8–7.1: 3 areas
  • 7.1–7.5: 4 areas
  • 7.5–7.9: 3 areas
  • 7.9–8.2: 3 areas
  • 8.2–8.6: 2 areas
  • 8.6–8.9: 2 areas
  • 8.9–9.3: 1 area
  • 9.3–9.6: 1 area
  • 9.6–10.0: 0 areas

All region (sa4) areas, 2021. The marker is West and North West — somewhat walkable of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
West and North West4.3
Rest of Tas. 4.1
Tasmania 4.7

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in West and North West by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

The walkability score is 4.3, which is about the same as the Tasmanian figure of 4.7. Roughly 51.6% of homes have a 15-minute-city walkshed, a little below the state's 53.9%.

4.3

Somewhat walkable of region (sa4) areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

4.4

Lower than 62% of region (sa4) areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

51.6%

Lower than 61% of region (sa4) areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Access to parks is the biggest gap, with 70.9% of homes within a 15-minute walk, well below the state's 78.6%. This contrasts with schools, where 53.3% of homes are within a 15-minute walk, about the same as the state average.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

The average terrain slope is 7.2%, which is a little below the Tasmanian figure of 8.8%. There is one intersection per square kilometre, and there are 17.3 walkable amenities per 1,000 residents, which is a little below the state figure of 20.5.

17.3

Higher than 61% of region (sa4) areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

7.2%

Higher than 80% of region (sa4) areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for West and North West

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in West and North West [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/sa4/604/west-and-north-west/topic/walkability