South East · Region (SA4)

Walkability in South East

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

Far fewer homes have easy access to local amenities in South East compared to the rest of Tasmania. The area is mostly car-dependent, with only 22.7% of households located within a 15-minute walk of basic services, which is far below the state figure of 53.9%.

Open map →
📍 South East, Region (SA4)

Where South East sits — Walkability score

2.0 Mostly car-dependent
  • 0.0–0.4: 2 areas
  • 0.4–0.7: 0 areas
  • 0.7–1.1: 0 areas
  • 1.1–1.4: 0 areas
  • 1.4–1.8: 0 areas
  • 1.8–2.1: 1 area
  • 2.1–2.5: 1 area
  • 2.5–2.9: 3 areas
  • 2.9–3.2: 4 areas
  • 3.2–3.6: 1 area
  • 3.6–3.9: 6 areas
  • 3.9–4.3: 13 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 9 areas
  • 4.6–5.0: 7 areas
  • 5.0–5.4: 2 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 6 areas
  • 5.7–6.1: 9 areas
  • 6.1–6.4: 6 areas
  • 6.4–6.8: 2 areas
  • 6.8–7.1: 3 areas
  • 7.1–7.5: 4 areas
  • 7.5–7.9: 3 areas
  • 7.9–8.2: 3 areas
  • 8.2–8.6: 2 areas
  • 8.6–8.9: 2 areas
  • 8.9–9.3: 1 area
  • 9.3–9.6: 1 area
  • 9.6–10.0: 0 areas

All region (sa4) areas, 2021. The marker is South East — mostly car-dependent of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
South East2.0
Rest of Tas. 4.1
Tasmania 4.7

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in South East by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

A walkability score of 2.0 means the area is mostly car-dependent, falling far below the Tasmanian average of 4.7. On average, there are only 2.1 amenity types within a 15-minute walk, compared to 4.5 across the state.

2.0

Mostly car-dependent of region (sa4) areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

2.1

Lower than 97% of region (sa4) areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

22.7%

Lower than 97% of region (sa4) areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Access to services is limited, with only 15.8% of homes within 15 minutes of health services and 19.4% near a school, both far below state levels. While parks are the most common amenity, 77% of homes are more than 30 minutes away from health services and 70% are over 30 minutes from a school.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

The terrain is a little steeper than the state average, with a typical slope of 10.6%. There are 33.6 walkable amenities per 1,000 residents, which is far above the state figure, though street connectivity is 0.

33.6

Higher than 98% of region (sa4) areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

10.6%

Higher than 99% of region (sa4) areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for South East

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in South East [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/sa4/603/south-east/topic/walkability