Inner Regional Australia · Remoteness Area

Walkability in Inner Regional Australia

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

Only 36.1% of homes have health services within a 15-minute walk, a stark contrast to the much easier access to parks and transport seen across Inner Regional Australia. While the area is rated as somewhat walkable, the experience varies wildly depending on what you need to reach. Roughly half of all households can access a wide range of local amenities on foot.

Open map →
📍 Inner Regional Australia, Remoteness Area

Where Inner Regional Australia sits — Walkability score

4.3 Somewhat walkable
  • 0.0–0.3: 2 areas
  • 0.3–0.6: 0 areas
  • 0.6–0.9: 1 area
  • 0.9–1.1: 1 area
  • 1.1–1.4: 0 areas
  • 1.4–1.7: 0 areas
  • 1.7–2.0: 1 area
  • 2.0–2.3: 0 areas
  • 2.3–2.6: 2 areas
  • 2.6–2.9: 3 areas
  • 2.9–3.1: 1 area
  • 3.1–3.4: 10 areas
  • 3.4–3.7: 5 areas
  • 3.7–4.0: 1 area
  • 4.0–4.3: 2 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 0 areas
  • 4.6–4.9: 0 areas
  • 4.9–5.1: 0 areas
  • 5.1–5.4: 0 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 0 areas
  • 5.7–6.0: 2 areas
  • 6.0–6.3: 2 areas
  • 6.3–6.6: 0 areas
  • 6.6–6.9: 1 area
  • 6.9–7.1: 2 areas
  • 7.1–7.4: 1 area
  • 7.4–7.7: 0 areas
  • 7.7–8.0: 0 areas

All remoteness area areas, 2021. The marker is Inner Regional Australia — somewhat walkable of areas.

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Inner Regional Australia by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

About 48% of homes have a 15-minute-city walkshed, with an average of 4.2 different amenity types reachable within that timeframe. This gives the region a walkability score of 4.3, which is considered somewhat walkable.

4.3

Somewhat walkable of remoteness area areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

4.2

Higher than 74% of remoteness area areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

48.0%

Higher than 71% of remoteness area areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Walking to a park or public transport is common, with 77.5% and 62.2% of homes within a 15-minute walk. However, basic needs are harder to reach, as 39% of homes are more than 30 minutes away from the nearest health service.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

The region has a mean terrain slope of 5.0% and 3 intersections per square kilometre. There are 17.5 walkable amenities for every 1,000 residents.

17.5

Lower than 64% of remoteness area areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

5.0%

Lower than 52% of remoteness area areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Inner Regional Australia

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Inner Regional Australia [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/ra/RA21/inner-regional-australia/topic/walkability