Inner Regional Australia · Remoteness Area

Walkability in Inner Regional Australia

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

Fewer than half of the homes in Inner Regional Australia have a 15-minute-city walkshed, meaning most residents cannot reach a variety of daily needs on foot. The area is considered somewhat walkable with a score of 4.2. While many people can walk to a park or transport, accessing health services and groceries is much harder for the typical resident.

Open map →
📍 Inner Regional Australia, Remoteness Area

Where Inner Regional Australia sits — Walkability score

4.2 Somewhat walkable
  • 0.0–0.3: 2 areas
  • 0.3–0.6: 0 areas
  • 0.6–0.9: 1 area
  • 0.9–1.1: 1 area
  • 1.1–1.4: 0 areas
  • 1.4–1.7: 0 areas
  • 1.7–2.0: 1 area
  • 2.0–2.3: 0 areas
  • 2.3–2.6: 2 areas
  • 2.6–2.9: 3 areas
  • 2.9–3.1: 1 area
  • 3.1–3.4: 10 areas
  • 3.4–3.7: 5 areas
  • 3.7–4.0: 1 area
  • 4.0–4.3: 2 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 0 areas
  • 4.6–4.9: 0 areas
  • 4.9–5.1: 0 areas
  • 5.1–5.4: 0 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 0 areas
  • 5.7–6.0: 2 areas
  • 6.0–6.3: 2 areas
  • 6.3–6.6: 0 areas
  • 6.6–6.9: 1 area
  • 6.9–7.1: 2 areas
  • 7.1–7.4: 1 area
  • 7.4–7.7: 0 areas
  • 7.7–8.0: 0 areas

All remoteness area areas, 2021. The marker is Inner Regional Australia — somewhat walkable of areas.

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Inner Regional Australia by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

About 47.2% of homes have a 15-minute-city walkshed, with a typical resident having access to 4.1 different types of amenities within a 15-minute walk.

4.2

Somewhat walkable of remoteness area areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

4.1

Higher than 73% of remoteness area areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

47.2%

Higher than 69% of remoteness area areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Parks and public transport are the most accessible, with 73.7% and 67.0% of homes within a 15-minute walk respectively. In contrast, health services are the hardest to reach, as 45% of homes are more than 30 minutes away from the nearest one.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

The terrain has an average slope of 6.4%, with 2 intersections per square kilometre and 17.7 walkable amenities for every 1,000 residents.

17.7

Lower than 63% of remoteness area areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

6.4%

Higher than 79% of remoteness area areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Inner Regional Australia

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Inner Regional Australia [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/ra/RA11/inner-regional-australia/topic/walkability