Northern Midlands · Council (LGA)

Walkability in Northern Midlands

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

Health services are far harder to reach on foot than other needs in Northern Midlands, where 60% of homes are more than a 30-minute walk from a clinic. While the area is considered somewhat walkable, only 51.5% of homes have a 15-minute-city walkshed, which is a little below the Tasmanian figure.

Open map →
📍 Northern Midlands, Council (LGA)

Where Northern Midlands sits — Walkability score

4.0 Somewhat walkable
  • 0.0–0.4: 8 areas
  • 0.4–0.7: 7 areas
  • 0.7–1.1: 6 areas
  • 1.1–1.4: 11 areas
  • 1.4–1.8: 18 areas
  • 1.8–2.1: 25 areas
  • 2.1–2.5: 37 areas
  • 2.5–2.9: 36 areas
  • 2.9–3.2: 45 areas
  • 3.2–3.6: 58 areas
  • 3.6–3.9: 58 areas
  • 3.9–4.3: 45 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 24 areas
  • 4.6–5.0: 35 areas
  • 5.0–5.4: 19 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 13 areas
  • 5.7–6.1: 11 areas
  • 6.1–6.4: 7 areas
  • 6.4–6.8: 10 areas
  • 6.8–7.1: 10 areas
  • 7.1–7.5: 12 areas
  • 7.5–7.9: 13 areas
  • 7.9–8.2: 10 areas
  • 8.2–8.6: 12 areas
  • 8.6–8.9: 7 areas
  • 8.9–9.3: 6 areas
  • 9.3–9.6: 3 areas
  • 9.6–10.0: 1 area

All council (lga) areas, 2021. The marker is Northern Midlands — somewhat walkable of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
Northern Midlands4.0
Rest of Tas. 4.1
Tasmania 4.7

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Northern Midlands by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

The area has a walkability score of 4.0, making it somewhat walkable. This is a little below the Tasmania figure of 4.7, and the number of amenity types within a 15-minute walk is about the same as the state average.

4.0

Somewhat walkable of council (lga) areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

4.2

Higher than 57% of council (lga) areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

51.5%

Higher than 56% of council (lga) areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Access to health services, schools, and public transport is far below the state average. While 53.9% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of groceries—about the same as the state—only 25.7% can walk to health services within that time.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

The average terrain slope is 4.1%, which is well below the Tasmanian figure of 8.8%. There are 29.0 walkable amenities per 1,000 residents, which is well above the state average, though street connectivity is recorded at 0 intersections per km².

29.0

Higher than 72% of council (lga) areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

4.1%

Lower than 61% of council (lga) areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Northern Midlands

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Northern Midlands [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/lga/LGA64610/northern-midlands/topic/walkability