Renmark Paringa · Council (LGA)

Walkability in Renmark Paringa

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

Far fewer homes are within a short walk of public transport than in the rest of the state, which marks the biggest gap in Renmark Paringa's walkability. The area is considered somewhat walkable, though only 53.7% of homes have a 15-minute-city walkshed. This is far below the South Australian figure of 67.0%.

Open map →
📍 Renmark Paringa, Council (LGA)

Where Renmark Paringa sits — Walkability score

4.1 Somewhat walkable
  • 0.0–0.4: 8 areas
  • 0.4–0.7: 7 areas
  • 0.7–1.1: 6 areas
  • 1.1–1.4: 11 areas
  • 1.4–1.8: 18 areas
  • 1.8–2.1: 25 areas
  • 2.1–2.5: 37 areas
  • 2.5–2.9: 36 areas
  • 2.9–3.2: 45 areas
  • 3.2–3.6: 58 areas
  • 3.6–3.9: 58 areas
  • 3.9–4.3: 45 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 24 areas
  • 4.6–5.0: 35 areas
  • 5.0–5.4: 19 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 13 areas
  • 5.7–6.1: 11 areas
  • 6.1–6.4: 7 areas
  • 6.4–6.8: 10 areas
  • 6.8–7.1: 10 areas
  • 7.1–7.5: 12 areas
  • 7.5–7.9: 13 areas
  • 7.9–8.2: 10 areas
  • 8.2–8.6: 12 areas
  • 8.6–8.9: 7 areas
  • 8.9–9.3: 6 areas
  • 9.3–9.6: 3 areas
  • 9.6–10.0: 1 area

All council (lga) areas, 2021. The marker is Renmark Paringa — somewhat walkable of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
Renmark Paringa4.1
Rest of SA 3.2
South Australia 5.5

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Renmark Paringa by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

The walkability score for the area is 4.1, which is well below the state figure of 5.5. On average, residents have access to 4.4 amenity types within a 15-minute walk, a little below the state's 5.4.

4.1

Somewhat walkable of council (lga) areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

4.4

Higher than 61% of council (lga) areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

53.7%

Higher than 60% of council (lga) areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Access to daily needs is often limited; for example, only 40.9% of homes are within a 10-minute walk of public transport, far below the state's 76.1%. While 62.6% of homes are near a park, access to schools and health services is much lower, with both falling well below South Australian levels.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

The terrain is a little flatter than the state average, with a mean slope of 2.8%. There is one intersection per square kilometre, and the area has 18.3 walkable amenities per 1,000 residents, which is a little above the state figure of 16.3.

18.3

Lower than 52% of council (lga) areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

2.8%

Lower than 88% of council (lga) areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Renmark Paringa

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Renmark Paringa [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/lga/LGA46670/renmark-paringa/topic/walkability