Onkaparinga · Council (LGA)

Walkability in Onkaparinga

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

About 68% of homes in Onkaparinga pass the 15-minute city test, meaning residents can reach five or more essential services on foot. This makes the area somewhat walkable, with a score of 5.8, which is about the same as the South Australian figure.

Open map →
📍 Onkaparinga, Council (LGA)

Where Onkaparinga sits — Walkability score

5.8 Somewhat walkable
  • 0.0–0.4: 8 areas
  • 0.4–0.7: 7 areas
  • 0.7–1.1: 6 areas
  • 1.1–1.4: 11 areas
  • 1.4–1.8: 18 areas
  • 1.8–2.1: 25 areas
  • 2.1–2.5: 37 areas
  • 2.5–2.9: 36 areas
  • 2.9–3.2: 45 areas
  • 3.2–3.6: 58 areas
  • 3.6–3.9: 58 areas
  • 3.9–4.3: 45 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 24 areas
  • 4.6–5.0: 35 areas
  • 5.0–5.4: 19 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 13 areas
  • 5.7–6.1: 11 areas
  • 6.1–6.4: 7 areas
  • 6.4–6.8: 10 areas
  • 6.8–7.1: 10 areas
  • 7.1–7.5: 12 areas
  • 7.5–7.9: 13 areas
  • 7.9–8.2: 10 areas
  • 8.2–8.6: 12 areas
  • 8.6–8.9: 7 areas
  • 8.9–9.3: 6 areas
  • 9.3–9.6: 3 areas
  • 9.6–10.0: 1 area

All council (lga) areas, 2021. The marker is Onkaparinga — somewhat walkable of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
Onkaparinga5.8
Greater Adelaide 6.6
South Australia 5.5

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Onkaparinga by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

The walkability score for Onkaparinga is 5.8, which is considered somewhat walkable. This is about the same as the South Australian average of 5.5, with residents having access to an average of 5.6 different amenity types within a 15-minute walk.

5.8

Somewhat walkable of council (lga) areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

5.6

Higher than 78% of council (lga) areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

68.0%

Higher than 76% of council (lga) areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Access to nature and transit is a major highlight, as 94.8% of homes are within a 15-minute walk of a park and 91.1% are near public transport—both figures being well above the state average. However, other services are harder to reach, with only 55.3% of homes within a 15-minute walk of health services.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

The area has 39 intersections per square kilometre and a mean terrain slope of 5.6%, which is a little above the South Australian figure. There are 17.6 walkable amenities per 1,000 residents, also slightly above the state average.

17.6

Lower than 54% of council (lga) areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

5.6%

Higher than 64% of council (lga) areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Onkaparinga

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Onkaparinga [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/lga/LGA45340/onkaparinga/topic/walkability