Murray Bridge · Council (LGA)

Walkability in Murray Bridge

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

Fewer than half of the homes in Murray Bridge are within a 15-minute walk of a school or grocery store. This makes the area mostly car-dependent, with a walkability score of 3.6, which is well below the South Australian figure of 5.5.

Open map →
📍 Murray Bridge, Council (LGA)

Where Murray Bridge sits — Walkability score

3.6 Mostly car-dependent
  • 0.0–0.4: 8 areas
  • 0.4–0.7: 7 areas
  • 0.7–1.1: 6 areas
  • 1.1–1.4: 11 areas
  • 1.4–1.8: 18 areas
  • 1.8–2.1: 25 areas
  • 2.1–2.5: 37 areas
  • 2.5–2.9: 36 areas
  • 2.9–3.2: 45 areas
  • 3.2–3.6: 58 areas
  • 3.6–3.9: 58 areas
  • 3.9–4.3: 45 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 24 areas
  • 4.6–5.0: 35 areas
  • 5.0–5.4: 19 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 13 areas
  • 5.7–6.1: 11 areas
  • 6.1–6.4: 7 areas
  • 6.4–6.8: 10 areas
  • 6.8–7.1: 10 areas
  • 7.1–7.5: 12 areas
  • 7.5–7.9: 13 areas
  • 7.9–8.2: 10 areas
  • 8.2–8.6: 12 areas
  • 8.6–8.9: 7 areas
  • 8.9–9.3: 6 areas
  • 9.3–9.6: 3 areas
  • 9.6–10.0: 1 area

All council (lga) areas, 2021. The marker is Murray Bridge — mostly car-dependent of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
Murray Bridge3.6
Rest of SA 3.2
South Australia 5.5

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Murray Bridge by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

Only 40.1% of homes have a 15-minute-city walkshed, a figure far below the 67.0% seen across South Australia. On average, residents have access to 3.7 amenity types within a 15-minute walk, which is well below the state average of 5.4.

3.6

Mostly car-dependent of council (lga) areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

3.7

Lower than 57% of council (lga) areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

40.1%

Lower than 64% of council (lga) areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Parks are the most accessible amenity, with 68.8% of homes within a 15-minute walk, while health services are the hardest to reach, at 34.4%—both figures are far below state levels. Only 59.7% of homes are within a 10-minute walk of public transport, which is far below the South Australian figure of 76.1%.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

The area has a street connectivity of 2 intersections per square kilometre and a typical terrain slope of 4.1%, which is about the same as the South Australian average. There are 11.7 walkable amenities per 1,000 residents, which is well below the state figure of 16.3.

11.7

Lower than 86% of council (lga) areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

4.1%

Lower than 61% of council (lga) areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Murray Bridge

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Murray Bridge [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/lga/LGA45040/murray-bridge/topic/walkability