Light · Council (LGA)

Walkability in Light

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

Only 30.7% of homes in Light have a 15-minute-city walkshed, which is far below the South Australian figure of 67%. This makes the area mostly car-dependent, as the typical resident has very few amenities within a short walk from their door.

Open map →
📍 Light, Council (LGA)

Where Light sits — Walkability score

2.6 Mostly car-dependent
  • 0.0–0.4: 8 areas
  • 0.4–0.7: 7 areas
  • 0.7–1.1: 6 areas
  • 1.1–1.4: 11 areas
  • 1.4–1.8: 18 areas
  • 1.8–2.1: 25 areas
  • 2.1–2.5: 37 areas
  • 2.5–2.9: 36 areas
  • 2.9–3.2: 45 areas
  • 3.2–3.6: 58 areas
  • 3.6–3.9: 58 areas
  • 3.9–4.3: 45 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 24 areas
  • 4.6–5.0: 35 areas
  • 5.0–5.4: 19 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 13 areas
  • 5.7–6.1: 11 areas
  • 6.1–6.4: 7 areas
  • 6.4–6.8: 10 areas
  • 6.8–7.1: 10 areas
  • 7.1–7.5: 12 areas
  • 7.5–7.9: 13 areas
  • 7.9–8.2: 10 areas
  • 8.2–8.6: 12 areas
  • 8.6–8.9: 7 areas
  • 8.9–9.3: 6 areas
  • 9.3–9.6: 3 areas
  • 9.6–10.0: 1 area

All council (lga) areas, 2021. The marker is Light — mostly car-dependent of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
Light2.6
Rest of SA 3.2
South Australia 5.5

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Light by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

The walkability score for Light is 2.6, which means it is mostly car-dependent. This is far below the South Australian average of 5.5, with far fewer amenity types available within a 15-minute walk than in other parts of the state.

2.6

Mostly car-dependent of council (lga) areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

2.9

Lower than 77% of council (lga) areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

30.7%

Lower than 80% of council (lga) areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Access to basics is limited, with only 22% of homes within a 15-minute walk of health services and 24.1% near groceries, both far below the state average. Parks are the most accessible amenity for 43.4% of residents, though 70% of homes are still more than 30 minutes away from health services.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

There are 11.1 walkable amenities per 1,000 residents, which is well below the South Australian figure of 16.3. The area has two intersections per square kilometre and a mean terrain slope of 4.5%, which is about the same as the rest of the state.

11.1

Lower than 87% of council (lga) areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

4.5%

Lower than 53% of council (lga) areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Light

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Light [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/lga/LGA43650/light/topic/walkability