Scenic Rim · Council (LGA)

Walkability in Scenic Rim

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

Only 21% of homes in Scenic Rim have the basic services needed for a 15-minute city, making it a car-dependent area. Most residents live far from essential hubs, with a typical walkability score of 1.9, which is far below the Queensland figure of 5.0.

Open map →
📍 Scenic Rim, Council (LGA)

Where Scenic Rim sits — Walkability score

1.9 Car-dependent
  • 0.0–0.4: 8 areas
  • 0.4–0.7: 7 areas
  • 0.7–1.1: 6 areas
  • 1.1–1.4: 11 areas
  • 1.4–1.8: 18 areas
  • 1.8–2.1: 25 areas
  • 2.1–2.5: 37 areas
  • 2.5–2.9: 36 areas
  • 2.9–3.2: 45 areas
  • 3.2–3.6: 58 areas
  • 3.6–3.9: 58 areas
  • 3.9–4.3: 45 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 24 areas
  • 4.6–5.0: 35 areas
  • 5.0–5.4: 19 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 13 areas
  • 5.7–6.1: 11 areas
  • 6.1–6.4: 7 areas
  • 6.4–6.8: 10 areas
  • 6.8–7.1: 10 areas
  • 7.1–7.5: 12 areas
  • 7.5–7.9: 13 areas
  • 7.9–8.2: 10 areas
  • 8.2–8.6: 12 areas
  • 8.6–8.9: 7 areas
  • 8.9–9.3: 6 areas
  • 9.3–9.6: 3 areas
  • 9.6–10.0: 1 area

All council (lga) areas, 2021. The marker is Scenic Rim — car-dependent of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
Scenic Rim1.9
Greater Brisbane 6.1
Queensland 5.0

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Scenic Rim by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

The area is rated as car-dependent, with a score of 1.9 compared to the state's 5.0. On average, people have access to only 2 types of amenities within a 15-minute walk, which is far below the Queensland figure of 4.8.

1.9

Car-dependent of council (lga) areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

2.0

Lower than 89% of council (lga) areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

20.9%

Lower than 89% of council (lga) areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Access to essentials is limited, with only 5.8% of homes within a 10-minute walk of public transport. While parks are the most common nearby amenity, 66% of homes are more than 30 minutes away from health services.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

The terrain is steeper than the state average, with a mean slope of 9.4%. There is one intersection per square kilometre, and the number of walkable amenities per 1,000 residents is about the same as across Queensland.

13.5

Lower than 74% of council (lga) areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

9.4%

Higher than 94% of council (lga) areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Scenic Rim

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Scenic Rim [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/lga/LGA36510/scenic-rim/topic/walkability