Mitchell · Council (LGA)

Walkability in Mitchell

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

A modest slope of 5.2% defines the landscape in Mitchell, which is mostly car-dependent with a walkability score of 3.3. Very few residents can reach a variety of services on foot, with only 29.5% of homes having a 15-minute-city walkshed.

Open map →
📍 Mitchell, Council (LGA)

Where Mitchell sits — Walkability score

3.3 Mostly car-dependent
  • 0.0–0.4: 8 areas
  • 0.4–0.7: 7 areas
  • 0.7–1.1: 6 areas
  • 1.1–1.4: 11 areas
  • 1.4–1.8: 18 areas
  • 1.8–2.1: 25 areas
  • 2.1–2.5: 37 areas
  • 2.5–2.9: 36 areas
  • 2.9–3.2: 45 areas
  • 3.2–3.6: 58 areas
  • 3.6–3.9: 58 areas
  • 3.9–4.3: 45 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 24 areas
  • 4.6–5.0: 35 areas
  • 5.0–5.4: 19 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 13 areas
  • 5.7–6.1: 11 areas
  • 6.1–6.4: 7 areas
  • 6.4–6.8: 10 areas
  • 6.8–7.1: 10 areas
  • 7.1–7.5: 12 areas
  • 7.5–7.9: 13 areas
  • 7.9–8.2: 10 areas
  • 8.2–8.6: 12 areas
  • 8.6–8.9: 7 areas
  • 8.9–9.3: 6 areas
  • 9.3–9.6: 3 areas
  • 9.6–10.0: 1 area

All council (lga) areas, 2021. The marker is Mitchell — mostly car-dependent of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
Mitchell3.3
Rest of Vic. 4.5
Victoria 6.4

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Mitchell by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

The walkability score of 3.3 means the area is mostly car-dependent, which is far below the Victorian figure of 6.4. On average, there are only 3.3 amenity types within a 15-minute walk, compared to 6.0 across the state.

3.3

Mostly car-dependent of council (lga) areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

3.3

Lower than 70% of council (lga) areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

29.5%

Lower than 81% of council (lga) areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Access to basic needs is far below state levels, especially for groceries and health services, where only about a quarter of homes are within a 15-minute walk. While 74.5% of homes are near a park, 53% of residents must walk more than 30 minutes to reach the nearest grocery store.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

There are 2 intersections per square kilometre and 12.1 walkable amenities per 1,000 residents, which is well below the Victorian figure of 15.7. The terrain slope is about the same as the state average.

12.1

Lower than 83% of council (lga) areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

5.2%

Higher than 59% of council (lga) areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Mitchell

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Mitchell [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/lga/LGA24850/mitchell/topic/walkability