Tenterfield · Council (LGA)

Walkability in Tenterfield

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

A steeper average slope of 8.1% makes Tenterfield a bit hillier than the state average, contributing to a walking environment that is mostly car-dependent. Only 30.2% of homes have the basic amenities needed for a 15-minute city, which is far below the New South Wales figure of 71.9%.

Open map →
📍 Tenterfield, Council (LGA)

Where Tenterfield sits — Walkability score

2.3 Mostly car-dependent
  • 0.0–0.4: 8 areas
  • 0.4–0.7: 7 areas
  • 0.7–1.1: 6 areas
  • 1.1–1.4: 11 areas
  • 1.4–1.8: 18 areas
  • 1.8–2.1: 25 areas
  • 2.1–2.5: 37 areas
  • 2.5–2.9: 36 areas
  • 2.9–3.2: 45 areas
  • 3.2–3.6: 58 areas
  • 3.6–3.9: 58 areas
  • 3.9–4.3: 45 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 24 areas
  • 4.6–5.0: 35 areas
  • 5.0–5.4: 19 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 13 areas
  • 5.7–6.1: 11 areas
  • 6.1–6.4: 7 areas
  • 6.4–6.8: 10 areas
  • 6.8–7.1: 10 areas
  • 7.1–7.5: 12 areas
  • 7.5–7.9: 13 areas
  • 7.9–8.2: 10 areas
  • 8.2–8.6: 12 areas
  • 8.6–8.9: 7 areas
  • 8.9–9.3: 6 areas
  • 9.3–9.6: 3 areas
  • 9.6–10.0: 1 area

All council (lga) areas, 2021. The marker is Tenterfield — mostly car-dependent of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
Tenterfield2.3
Rest of NSW 4.6
New South Wales 6.2

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Tenterfield by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

The walkability score is 2.3, meaning the area is mostly car-dependent and far below the state average of 6.2. On average, residents have access to just 2.6 amenity types within a 15-minute walk, compared to 5.8 across New South Wales.

2.3

Mostly car-dependent of council (lga) areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

2.6

Lower than 83% of council (lga) areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

30.2%

Lower than 80% of council (lga) areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Access to everyday needs is far below state levels; only 42.4% of homes are within 15 minutes of a park and just 16.9% are near public transport. While parks are the most common local amenity, over 60% of homes are more than 30 minutes away from health services, schools, and groceries.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

There are 26.0 walkable amenities per 1,000 residents, which is far above the state figure of 14.7. Street connectivity is recorded at 0 intersections per square kilometre.

26.0

Higher than 68% of council (lga) areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

8.1%

Higher than 88% of council (lga) areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Tenterfield

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Tenterfield [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/lga/LGA17400/tenterfield/topic/walkability