Lyons · Federal Electorate

Walkability in Lyons

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

Only 19.7% of homes in Lyons are within a 15-minute walk of health services, a gap that is far below the Tasmanian figure. This reflects a wider trend where the area is mostly car-dependent, with only 37.2% of homes having a 15-minute-city walkshed.

Open map →
📍 Lyons, Federal Electorate

Where Lyons sits — Walkability score

3.2 Mostly car-dependent
  • 2.0–2.3: 3 areas
  • 2.3–2.6: 3 areas
  • 2.6–2.9: 0 areas
  • 2.9–3.1: 2 areas
  • 3.1–3.4: 7 areas
  • 3.4–3.7: 4 areas
  • 3.7–4.0: 9 areas
  • 4.0–4.3: 10 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 4 areas
  • 4.6–4.9: 14 areas
  • 4.9–5.1: 11 areas
  • 5.1–5.4: 7 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 4 areas
  • 5.7–6.0: 5 areas
  • 6.0–6.3: 7 areas
  • 6.3–6.6: 10 areas
  • 6.6–6.9: 4 areas
  • 6.9–7.1: 5 areas
  • 7.1–7.4: 11 areas
  • 7.4–7.7: 6 areas
  • 7.7–8.0: 8 areas
  • 8.0–8.3: 5 areas
  • 8.3–8.6: 5 areas
  • 8.6–8.9: 4 areas
  • 8.9–9.1: 3 areas
  • 9.1–9.4: 0 areas
  • 9.4–9.7: 2 areas
  • 9.7–10.0: 0 areas

All federal electorate areas, 2021. The marker is Lyons — mostly car-dependent of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
Lyons3.2
Rest of Tas. 4.1
Tasmania 4.7

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Lyons by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

The walkability score for Lyons is 3.2, which means the area is mostly car-dependent. This is well below the Tasmanian figure of 4.7, and typical residents have access to far fewer amenity types within a 15-minute walk than elsewhere in the state.

3.2

Mostly car-dependent of federal electorate areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

3.2

Lower than 92% of federal electorate areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

37.2%

Lower than 90% of federal electorate areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Access to basics is far below the state average, with only 34.1% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a school. While 63.3% of homes are near a park, the most significant gap is for health services, where 68% of residents live more than 30 minutes away on foot.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

The average terrain slope is 7.8%, which is about the same as the state average. There is one intersection per square kilometre, and there are 24.3 walkable amenities per 1,000 residents, which is a little above the Tasmanian figure.

24.3

Higher than 98% of federal electorate areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

7.8%

Higher than 88% of federal electorate areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Lyons

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Lyons [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/ced/CED605/lyons/topic/walkability