Clark · Federal Electorate

Walkability in Clark

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

Almost 70% of homes in Clark pass the 15-minute-city test, meaning residents can reach five or more different types of amenities on foot. This makes the area very walkable, with a score of 6.4 that is well above the Tasmanian figure of 4.7.

Open map →
📍 Clark, Federal Electorate

Where Clark sits — Walkability score

6.4 Very walkable
  • 2.0–2.3: 3 areas
  • 2.3–2.6: 3 areas
  • 2.6–2.9: 0 areas
  • 2.9–3.1: 2 areas
  • 3.1–3.4: 7 areas
  • 3.4–3.7: 4 areas
  • 3.7–4.0: 9 areas
  • 4.0–4.3: 10 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 4 areas
  • 4.6–4.9: 14 areas
  • 4.9–5.1: 11 areas
  • 5.1–5.4: 7 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 4 areas
  • 5.7–6.0: 5 areas
  • 6.0–6.3: 7 areas
  • 6.3–6.6: 10 areas
  • 6.6–6.9: 4 areas
  • 6.9–7.1: 5 areas
  • 7.1–7.4: 11 areas
  • 7.4–7.7: 6 areas
  • 7.7–8.0: 8 areas
  • 8.0–8.3: 5 areas
  • 8.3–8.6: 5 areas
  • 8.6–8.9: 4 areas
  • 8.9–9.1: 3 areas
  • 9.1–9.4: 0 areas
  • 9.4–9.7: 2 areas
  • 9.7–10.0: 0 areas

All federal electorate areas, 2021. The marker is Clark — very walkable of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
Clark6.4
Greater Hobart 5.6
Tasmania 4.7

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Clark by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

People in Clark have access to nearly six different amenity types within a 15-minute walk, which is well above the state average of 4.5. This high level of access means far more homes here fit the 15-minute-city model compared to the rest of Tasmania.

6.4

Very walkable of federal electorate areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

5.9

Higher than 57% of federal electorate areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

69.8%

Higher than 52% of federal electorate areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Access to basics is excellent, with 96.3% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a park and 94.2% near public transport, both far above state figures. Health services are the hardest amenity to reach on foot, with 12% of homes located more than a 30-minute walk away.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

The local terrain has a mean slope of 11.2%, which is a little above the Tasmanian average of 8.8%. There are 38 intersections per square kilometre, and the number of walkable amenities per 1,000 residents is about the same as the state figure.

21.1

Higher than 89% of federal electorate areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

11.2%

Higher than 99% of federal electorate areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Clark

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Clark [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/ced/CED603/clark/topic/walkability