Kingston · Federal Electorate

Walkability in Kingston

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

Steeper slopes than the state average define the landscape in Kingston, yet the area remains very walkable. A high number of homes are well-placed for daily needs, with 71% of residents having a good range of amenities within a 15-minute walk.

Open map →
📍 Kingston, Federal Electorate

Where Kingston sits — Walkability score

6.0 Very walkable
  • 2.0–2.3: 3 areas
  • 2.3–2.6: 3 areas
  • 2.6–2.9: 0 areas
  • 2.9–3.1: 2 areas
  • 3.1–3.4: 7 areas
  • 3.4–3.7: 4 areas
  • 3.7–4.0: 9 areas
  • 4.0–4.3: 10 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 4 areas
  • 4.6–4.9: 14 areas
  • 4.9–5.1: 11 areas
  • 5.1–5.4: 7 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 4 areas
  • 5.7–6.0: 5 areas
  • 6.0–6.3: 7 areas
  • 6.3–6.6: 10 areas
  • 6.6–6.9: 4 areas
  • 6.9–7.1: 5 areas
  • 7.1–7.4: 11 areas
  • 7.4–7.7: 6 areas
  • 7.7–8.0: 8 areas
  • 8.0–8.3: 5 areas
  • 8.3–8.6: 5 areas
  • 8.6–8.9: 4 areas
  • 8.9–9.1: 3 areas
  • 9.1–9.4: 0 areas
  • 9.4–9.7: 2 areas
  • 9.7–10.0: 0 areas

All federal electorate areas, 2021. The marker is Kingston — very walkable of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
Kingston6.0
Greater Adelaide 6.6
South Australia 5.5

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Kingston by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

The walkability score for Kingston is 6.0, which is considered very walkable and a little above the South Australian figure of 5.5. On average, residents have about 5.8 different amenity types within a 15-minute walk.

6.0

Very walkable of federal electorate areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

5.8

Higher than 56% of federal electorate areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

71.0%

Higher than 53% of federal electorate areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

Access to parks and public transport is a major strength, with 98.1% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a park and 94.6% near transport—both far above state figures. Conversely, health services are the hardest to reach, as 19% of homes are more than a 30-minute walk away.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

The area has a mean terrain slope of 6.0%, which is a little above the South Australian average. There are 109 intersections per square kilometre and 19.9 walkable amenities per 1,000 residents, which is a little above the state figure.

19.9

Higher than 86% of federal electorate areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

6.0%

Higher than 61% of federal electorate areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Kingston

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Kingston [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/ced/CED406/kingston/topic/walkability