Maranoa · Federal Electorate

Walkability in Maranoa

How much of daily life sits within a walk of home — a transparent 0–10 walkability score and the everyday destinations you can reach on foot: shops, public transport, schools, parks and health services, plus the streets and terrain in between.

Less than 1% of homes in Maranoa are within a short walk of public transport, creating a huge gap in access compared to the rest of the state. Most residents are mostly car-dependent, with only 34.8% of homes having a 15-minute-city walkshed. This is far below the Queensland figure of 59.1%.

Open map →
📍 Maranoa, Federal Electorate

Where Maranoa sits — Walkability score

2.4 Mostly car-dependent
  • 2.0–2.3: 3 areas
  • 2.3–2.6: 3 areas
  • 2.6–2.9: 0 areas
  • 2.9–3.1: 2 areas
  • 3.1–3.4: 7 areas
  • 3.4–3.7: 4 areas
  • 3.7–4.0: 9 areas
  • 4.0–4.3: 10 areas
  • 4.3–4.6: 4 areas
  • 4.6–4.9: 14 areas
  • 4.9–5.1: 11 areas
  • 5.1–5.4: 7 areas
  • 5.4–5.7: 4 areas
  • 5.7–6.0: 5 areas
  • 6.0–6.3: 7 areas
  • 6.3–6.6: 10 areas
  • 6.6–6.9: 4 areas
  • 6.9–7.1: 5 areas
  • 7.1–7.4: 11 areas
  • 7.4–7.7: 6 areas
  • 7.7–8.0: 8 areas
  • 8.0–8.3: 5 areas
  • 8.3–8.6: 5 areas
  • 8.6–8.9: 4 areas
  • 8.9–9.1: 3 areas
  • 9.1–9.4: 0 areas
  • 9.4–9.7: 2 areas
  • 9.7–10.0: 0 areas

All federal electorate areas, 2021. The marker is Maranoa — mostly car-dependent of areas.

Walkability score compared with the state and national average
Maranoa2.4
Rest of Qld 4.2
Queensland 5.0

Walking times to everyday amenities

Share of homes (G-NAF addresses) in Maranoa by walking time to the nearest amenity of each type, on an elevation-aware pedestrian network. How we calculate this →

The score

The overall walkability score and how much of daily life is a short walk away.

The walkability score for Maranoa is 2.4, which means the area is mostly car-dependent. This is far below the Queensland score of 5.0, and residents have far fewer amenity types within a 15-minute walk than people across the state.

2.4

Mostly car-dependent of federal electorate areas.

A 0–10 score for how much of daily life sits within an easy walk of the average home — weighing how close groceries, public transport, cafés, parks, health services, schools, culture and everyday services are, and how many of each. Walking times are measured on an elevation-aware pedestrian network, so hills count against reach. The methodology page describes how the score is put together.

2.7

Lower than 98% of federal electorate areas.

How many of the eight everyday amenity types — groceries, food & drink, health, schools, parks, culture, everyday services and public transport — the average home can reach on foot within 15 minutes, out of 8.

34.8%

Lower than 92% of federal electorate areas.

Share of local homes that can reach at least five of the eight everyday amenity types within a 15-minute walk — the "15-minute city" test. Homes are counted as addresses (G-NAF), not people.

What's in walking distance

How many homes can walk to groceries, transport, schools, parks and health services.

While nearly half of homes are within a 15-minute walk of a park, only 32.3% can walk to health services in the same time. Access to other essentials is also far below the state average, with only 35.4% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries.

Streets & terrain

Amenity density, how well the streets connect, and how hilly the walk is.

The average terrain slope is 4.5%, which is a little below the Queensland figure of 6.0%. There are 18.2 walkable amenities per 1,000 residents, which is well above the state average, though street connectivity is 0.

18.2

Higher than 73% of federal electorate areas.

Walkable amenities — shops, cafés, parks, health services, schools, cultural and community places, everyday services and public-transport stops — per 1,000 residents. Measures how much is around, apart from how far it is to walk there.

4.5%

Lower than 74% of federal electorate areas.

Average terrain slope across the area, as a percent grade. Steeper ground shortens how far people will walk; it is already folded into the walkability score through the elevation-aware pedestrian network, and is shown here on its own for context.

Sources

  • Walkability (OpenStreetMap, GTFS, ACARA & G-NAF, via Valhalla) — OpenStreetMap contributors, state transport agencies, ACARA & Geoscape Australia, 2026 (ODbL 1.0 + CC BY).

More for Maranoa

Cite this page

Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Walkability in Maranoa [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/region/ced/CED321/maranoa/topic/walkability