Compare
Rosebery vs Waratah
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 37 km apart · Rosebery profile · Waratah profile
Rosebery Waratah
Rosebery (L) and Waratah (L) are small, nearby Tasmanian areas with very different employment and housing patterns. Rosebery (L) has a much stronger working population, with 61.2% employed full-time compared to 40.7% in Waratah (L), and a higher share of residents earning $2,000 or more a week (11.9% versus 2.3%). Housing also differs sharply: Rosebery (L) has far more renters (27.4% versus 7.8%) and a higher number of people living alone (45.2% versus 32.4%). In contrast, Waratah (L) is noticeably older, with a typical resident aged 55 compared to 48 in Rosebery (L), and far more homes are owned outright (68.6% versus 48.0%).
Both areas are similarly somewhat walkable and have nearly the same share of people born overseas. This common ground exists alongside growing gaps in other areas; for example, the difference in home ownership has widened since 2011. While Rosebery (L) provides better access to schools and health services within a 15-minute walk, Waratah (L) has a far higher share of homes within easy reach of groceries. Health is a challenge in both places, though it is far more common for people in Waratah (L) to have a long-term health condition (51.5%) than in Rosebery (L) (37.7%).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 576
- First area, 2016: 693
- First area, 2021: 749
- Second area, 2011: 224
- Second area, 2016: 290
- Second area, 2021: 235
- First area, 2011: 40 yrs
- First area, 2016: 59 yrs
- First area, 2021: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 55 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 55 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Rosebery: 0.0% males, 0.9% females; 85+ in Waratah: 1.3% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Rosebery: 1.2% males, 1.2% females; 80–84 in Waratah: 2.2% males, 1.8% females
- 75–79 in Rosebery: 2.3% males, 0.7% females; 75–79 in Waratah: 2.7% males, 1.8% females
- 70–74 in Rosebery: 2.4% males, 2.0% females; 70–74 in Waratah: 4.0% males, 3.1% females
- 65–69 in Rosebery: 4.7% males, 4.5% females; 65–69 in Waratah: 6.3% males, 4.9% females
- 60–64 in Rosebery: 6.0% males, 3.5% females; 60–64 in Waratah: 5.8% males, 4.0% females
- 55–59 in Rosebery: 4.8% males, 5.6% females; 55–59 in Waratah: 4.5% males, 10.3% females
- 50–54 in Rosebery: 4.3% males, 2.7% females; 50–54 in Waratah: 4.9% males, 5.8% females
- 45–49 in Rosebery: 4.5% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Waratah: 1.8% males, 4.0% females
- 40–44 in Rosebery: 1.9% males, 2.7% females; 40–44 in Waratah: 1.8% males, 1.3% females
- 35–39 in Rosebery: 3.3% males, 3.6% females; 35–39 in Waratah: 1.8% males, 1.8% females
- 30–34 in Rosebery: 2.3% males, 3.6% females; 30–34 in Waratah: 1.3% males, 2.2% females
- 25–29 in Rosebery: 2.8% males, 1.6% females; 25–29 in Waratah: 1.3% males, 1.3% females
- 20–24 in Rosebery: 2.5% males, 2.4% females; 20–24 in Waratah: 1.3% males, 1.8% females
- 15–19 in Rosebery: 1.9% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Waratah: 1.8% males, 4.5% females
- 10–14 in Rosebery: 3.1% males, 2.8% females; 10–14 in Waratah: 3.1% males, 1.8% females
- 5–9 in Rosebery: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 5–9 in Waratah: 1.3% males, 2.2% females
- 0–4 in Rosebery: 0.8% males, 2.3% females; 0–4 in Waratah: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $564
- First area, 2016: $424
- First area, 2021: $528
- Second area, 2011: $370
- Second area, 2016: $430
- Second area, 2021: $432
- First area, 2011: $1,037
- First area, 2016: $706
- First area, 2021: $962
- Second area, 2011: $633
- Second area, 2016: $719
- Second area, 2021: $732
- First area, 2011: $1,209
- First area, 2016: $812
- First area, 2021: $1,292
- Second area, 2011: $719
- Second area, 2016: $949
- Second area, 2021: $955
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 2.0
- First area, 2021: 1.9
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 1.9
- Second area, 2021: 2.1
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $220
- First area, 2021: $150
- Second area, 2016: $200
- Second area, 2021: $245
- First area, 2011: $1,200
- First area, 2016: $1,000
- First area, 2021: $600
- Second area, 2011: $680
- Second area, 2016: $856
- Second area, 2021: $547
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Rosebery with nearby areas
Compare Waratah with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Rosebery vs Waratah [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL621023/rosebery/vs/UCL622026/waratah