Compare
Ulverstone vs Ridgley
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 29 km apart · Ulverstone profile · Ridgley profile
Ulverstone Ridgley
Ulverstone and Ridgley (L) are two nearby Tasmanian areas with very different profiles. Ulverstone is much older, with a typical resident aged 49 and 27.6% of people aged 65 and over, while Ridgley (L) is younger, with a typical age of 36. Ulverstone also has a far higher share of renters (25.0%) and people living alone (32.9%) compared to Ridgley (L), where 89.7% of homes have three or more bedrooms and 100% are separate houses.
Both areas sit near the national figure for people who have served in the Defence Force. Their other similarities include almost identical monthly home-loan payments and very similar levels of English proficiency. Over time, the gaps between them have often grown; for example, the difference in typical household income has widened to $374, and the gap in adults working or looking for work has increased to 12%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 19,819
- First area, 2016: 19,385
- First area, 2021: 12,723
- Second area, 2011: 307
- Second area, 2016: 344
- Second area, 2021: 401
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 41 yrs
- First area, 2021: 49 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 36 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Ulverstone: 1.5% males, 2.2% females; 85+ in Ridgley: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Ulverstone: 1.7% males, 2.2% females; 80–84 in Ridgley: 2.0% males, 1.3% females
- 75–79 in Ulverstone: 2.6% males, 3.1% females; 75–79 in Ridgley: 2.5% males, 1.0% females
- 70–74 in Ulverstone: 3.3% males, 4.0% females; 70–74 in Ridgley: 2.3% males, 2.3% females
- 65–69 in Ulverstone: 3.4% males, 3.7% females; 65–69 in Ridgley: 1.0% males, 2.5% females
- 60–64 in Ulverstone: 3.6% males, 4.1% females; 60–64 in Ridgley: 3.5% males, 3.3% females
- 55–59 in Ulverstone: 3.2% males, 3.9% females; 55–59 in Ridgley: 2.5% males, 2.5% females
- 50–54 in Ulverstone: 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 50–54 in Ridgley: 1.3% males, 4.8% females
- 45–49 in Ulverstone: 2.5% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Ridgley: 5.0% males, 4.3% females
- 40–44 in Ulverstone: 2.2% males, 2.5% females; 40–44 in Ridgley: 1.0% males, 2.3% females
- 35–39 in Ulverstone: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 35–39 in Ridgley: 2.5% males, 2.0% females
- 30–34 in Ulverstone: 2.2% males, 2.6% females; 30–34 in Ridgley: 4.5% males, 4.0% females
- 25–29 in Ulverstone: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 25–29 in Ridgley: 3.3% males, 3.8% females
- 20–24 in Ulverstone: 2.4% males, 2.6% females; 20–24 in Ridgley: 5.5% males, 3.0% females
- 15–19 in Ulverstone: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 15–19 in Ridgley: 4.5% males, 4.3% females
- 10–14 in Ulverstone: 2.9% males, 2.4% females; 10–14 in Ridgley: 2.8% males, 2.5% females
- 5–9 in Ulverstone: 2.8% males, 2.6% females; 5–9 in Ridgley: 1.8% males, 4.0% females
- 0–4 in Ulverstone: 2.2% males, 2.2% females; 0–4 in Ridgley: 2.8% males, 3.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $447
- First area, 2016: $512
- First area, 2021: $593
- Second area, 2011: $459
- Second area, 2016: $559
- Second area, 2021: $666
- First area, 2011: $813
- First area, 2016: $942
- First area, 2021: $1,070
- Second area, 2011: $850
- Second area, 2016: $1,068
- Second area, 2021: $1,444
- First area, 2011: $1,041
- First area, 2016: $1,236
- First area, 2021: $1,432
- Second area, 2011: $1,337
- Second area, 2016: $1,452
- Second area, 2021: $1,792
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 2.2
- First area, 2021: 2.2
- Second area, 2011: 2.1
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $200
- First area, 2021: $250
- Second area, 2016: $205
- Second area, 2021: $220
- First area, 2011: $1,127
- First area, 2016: $1,083
- First area, 2021: $1,200
- Second area, 2011: $1,517
- Second area, 2016: $1,083
- Second area, 2021: $1,240
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Ulverstone with nearby areas
Compare Ridgley with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Ulverstone vs Ridgley [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL613001/ulverstone/vs/UCL622020/ridgley