Compare
Mindibungu vs Lajamanu
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 341 km apart · Mindibungu profile · Lajamanu profile
Mindibungu Lajamanu
Lajamanu (L) and Mindibungu (L) are both small, remote areas with very high proportions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Lajamanu (L) is much younger and more family-focused, with 36.8% of people under 15 and 30% of homes being one-parent families. It also has a higher share of people using another language at home (92.3%) and a higher rate of people caring for children unpaid (67.8%). In contrast, Mindibungu (L) has more people finishing Year 12 (29.6% compared to 12.4% in Lajamanu (L)) and a much higher unemployment rate of 31.3%.
Since 2011, the gap between these two places has shifted across several measures. They have tracked differently over time, with the gap in language use and the share of children widening, while the difference in typical age has narrowed. They do share some commonalities, such as a similar proportion of detached houses and the fact that everyone in both areas lives within a 15-minute walk of groceries, health services, and schools.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 460
- First area, 2016: 472
- First area, 2021: 202
- Second area, 2011: 1,129
- Second area, 2016: 598
- Second area, 2021: 653
- First area, 2011: 44 yrs
- First area, 2016: 49 yrs
- First area, 2021: 25 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 22 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 21 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Mindibungu: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Lajamanu: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Mindibungu: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Lajamanu: 0.0% males, 0.9% females
- 75–79 in Mindibungu: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Lajamanu: 0.0% males, 0.6% females
- 70–74 in Mindibungu: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 70–74 in Lajamanu: 0.0% males, 0.6% females
- 65–69 in Mindibungu: 1.6% males, 0.0% females; 65–69 in Lajamanu: 0.5% males, 0.6% females
- 60–64 in Mindibungu: 3.7% males, 2.6% females; 60–64 in Lajamanu: 0.5% males, 1.7% females
- 55–59 in Mindibungu: 0.0% males, 2.6% females; 55–59 in Lajamanu: 1.7% males, 2.2% females
- 50–54 in Mindibungu: 2.1% males, 0.0% females; 50–54 in Lajamanu: 1.9% males, 1.4% females
- 45–49 in Mindibungu: 1.6% males, 4.7% females; 45–49 in Lajamanu: 1.1% males, 1.3% females
- 40–44 in Mindibungu: 1.6% males, 2.6% females; 40–44 in Lajamanu: 2.5% males, 4.1% females
- 35–39 in Mindibungu: 3.7% males, 2.6% females; 35–39 in Lajamanu: 3.0% males, 3.9% females
- 30–34 in Mindibungu: 3.7% males, 2.6% females; 30–34 in Lajamanu: 3.0% males, 4.7% females
- 25–29 in Mindibungu: 6.8% males, 7.9% females; 25–29 in Lajamanu: 2.8% males, 3.6% females
- 20–24 in Mindibungu: 3.2% males, 7.9% females; 20–24 in Lajamanu: 5.8% males, 4.9% females
- 15–19 in Mindibungu: 3.7% males, 5.3% females; 15–19 in Lajamanu: 5.3% males, 5.3% females
- 10–14 in Mindibungu: 2.6% males, 3.7% females; 10–14 in Lajamanu: 5.5% males, 7.4% females
- 5–9 in Mindibungu: 5.3% males, 5.3% females; 5–9 in Lajamanu: 5.8% males, 5.0% females
- 0–4 in Mindibungu: 6.8% males, 5.8% females; 0–4 in Lajamanu: 6.4% males, 6.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $478
- First area, 2016: $712
- First area, 2021: $278
- Second area, 2011: $1,143
- Second area, 2016: $263
- Second area, 2021: $195
- First area, 2011: $885
- First area, 2016: $1,141
- First area, 2021: $749
- Second area, 2011: $2,250
- Second area, 2016: $927
- Second area, 2021: $1,023
- First area, 2011: $1,025
- First area, 2016: $1,625
- First area, 2021: $617
- Second area, 2011: $2,506
- Second area, 2016: $612
- Second area, 2021: $436
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.1
- First area, 2016: 2.2
- First area, 2021: 3.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 4.6
- Second area, 2021: 4.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $138
- First area, 2021: $60
- Second area, 2016: $100
- Second area, 2021: $70
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 1.20
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 1.40
- Second area, 2021: 1.60
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Mindibungu with nearby areas
Compare Lajamanu with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Mindibungu vs Lajamanu [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL522045/mindibungu/vs/UCL721010/lajamanu