Compare
Roebourne vs Nullagine
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 331 km apart · Roebourne profile · Nullagine profile
Roebourne Nullagine
Roebourne and Nullagine are two small Western Australian towns located about 331 km apart. Roebourne is more transient, with 53.5% of people moving in within the last five years, while Nullagine is more stable at 29.5%. Nullagine has a higher share of residents who finished Year 12 (47.9% compared to 25.2% in Roebourne) and a higher proportion of people providing unpaid care (38.7% versus 14.8%). In contrast, Roebourne has a larger proportion of children under 15 and a higher share of people with long-term health conditions.
Both towns are very similar in their home sizes, with an average of 2.9 people per household. They also share a high proportion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander residents, which is far above the national figure in both places. Over time, some gaps have shifted; for instance, the lead in Year 12 completion and home ownership has flipped between the two since 2011, while the difference in the use of languages other than English has narrowed.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 667
- First area, 2016: 775
- First area, 2021: 700
- Second area, 2011: 205
- Second area, 2016: 290
- Second area, 2021: 147
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 48 yrs
- First area, 2021: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 38 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Roebourne: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Nullagine: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Roebourne: 1.0% males, 1.5% females; 80–84 in Nullagine: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Roebourne: 1.2% males, 0.4% females; 75–79 in Nullagine: 3.8% males, 3.0% females
- 70–74 in Roebourne: 1.9% males, 1.8% females; 70–74 in Nullagine: 3.0% males, 0.0% females
- 65–69 in Roebourne: 1.6% males, 3.4% females; 65–69 in Nullagine: 6.0% males, 0.0% females
- 60–64 in Roebourne: 4.4% males, 1.5% females; 60–64 in Nullagine: 0.0% males, 6.0% females
- 55–59 in Roebourne: 2.7% males, 2.4% females; 55–59 in Nullagine: 3.8% males, 0.0% females
- 50–54 in Roebourne: 2.4% males, 4.9% females; 50–54 in Nullagine: 4.5% males, 2.3% females
- 45–49 in Roebourne: 4.7% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Nullagine: 6.8% males, 0.0% females
- 40–44 in Roebourne: 3.0% males, 3.2% females; 40–44 in Nullagine: 3.0% males, 2.3% females
- 35–39 in Roebourne: 1.5% males, 3.7% females; 35–39 in Nullagine: 3.8% males, 2.3% females
- 30–34 in Roebourne: 3.5% males, 3.8% females; 30–34 in Nullagine: 3.8% males, 3.0% females
- 25–29 in Roebourne: 3.0% males, 3.4% females; 25–29 in Nullagine: 6.8% males, 3.8% females
- 20–24 in Roebourne: 3.8% males, 4.0% females; 20–24 in Nullagine: 9.0% males, 5.3% females
- 15–19 in Roebourne: 4.6% males, 3.2% females; 15–19 in Nullagine: 3.8% males, 2.3% females
- 10–14 in Roebourne: 4.4% males, 3.8% females; 10–14 in Nullagine: 3.0% males, 3.8% females
- 5–9 in Roebourne: 3.4% males, 2.7% females; 5–9 in Nullagine: 0.0% males, 3.0% females
- 0–4 in Roebourne: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 0–4 in Nullagine: 2.3% males, 0.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $926
- First area, 2016: $639
- First area, 2021: $376
- Second area, 2011: $251
- Second area, 2016: $732
- Second area, 2021: $296
- First area, 2011: $1,466
- First area, 2016: $1,228
- First area, 2021: $1,097
- Second area, 2011: $979
- Second area, 2016: $1,261
- Second area, 2021: $1,357
- First area, 2011: $1,791
- First area, 2016: $1,338
- First area, 2021: $1,009
- Second area, 2011: $577
- Second area, 2016: $1,674
- Second area, 2021: $780
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.9
- Second area, 2011: 4.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.0
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $333
- First area, 2021: $178
- Second area, 2016: $197
- Second area, 2021: $40
- First area, 2011: $1,858
- First area, 2016: $1,674
- First area, 2021: $1,500
- Second area, 2016: $1,168
- First area, 2011: 1.20
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 1.00
- Second area, 2011: 2.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 1.10
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Roebourne with nearby areas
Compare Nullagine with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Roebourne vs Nullagine [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL521046/roebourne/vs/UCL522052/nullagine