Compare
Kimba vs Port Neill
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 110 km apart · Kimba profile · Port Neill profile
Kimba Port Neill
Kimba (L) and Port Neill (L) are two small South Australian areas with very different profiles. Kimba (L) has a higher share of children (15.8%), a higher proportion of full-time workers (60.3%), and many more recent arrivals from overseas (24.3%). Homes in Kimba (L) are more likely to have three or more bedrooms (81.5%). In contrast, Port Neill (L) is a sparsely populated area where residents are far older, with a typical age of 59. It also has a higher share of people living alone (42.3%) and a much lower typical weekly income of $774.
Both areas are almost identical in the languages spoken at home and have very similar typical family incomes. They also share an almost equal lack of people who work from home. While they have much in common, some gaps have grown since 2011, such as the difference in the number of people moving into the area and the share of people with no religion, which is far higher in Kimba (L).
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 670
- First area, 2016: 562
- First area, 2021: 608
- Second area, 2011: 490
- Second area, 2016: 264
- Second area, 2021: 154
- First area, 2011: 52 yrs
- First area, 2016: 51 yrs
- First area, 2021: 50 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 61 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 52 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 59 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Kimba: 2.3% males, 3.4% females; 85+ in Port Neill: 0.0% males, 3.5% females
- 80–84 in Kimba: 3.1% males, 2.3% females; 80–84 in Port Neill: 2.1% males, 2.1% females
- 75–79 in Kimba: 3.9% males, 2.6% females; 75–79 in Port Neill: 3.5% males, 3.5% females
- 70–74 in Kimba: 3.7% males, 3.6% females; 70–74 in Port Neill: 6.3% males, 2.1% females
- 65–69 in Kimba: 3.9% males, 2.8% females; 65–69 in Port Neill: 6.3% males, 12.0% females
- 60–64 in Kimba: 4.1% males, 4.4% females; 60–64 in Port Neill: 7.0% males, 5.6% females
- 55–59 in Kimba: 3.3% males, 3.1% females; 55–59 in Port Neill: 7.7% males, 7.0% females
- 50–54 in Kimba: 2.3% males, 2.1% females; 50–54 in Port Neill: 7.0% males, 5.6% females
- 45–49 in Kimba: 1.6% males, 2.3% females; 45–49 in Port Neill: 3.5% males, 0.0% females
- 40–44 in Kimba: 2.8% males, 1.3% females; 40–44 in Port Neill: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 35–39 in Kimba: 3.9% males, 3.1% females; 35–39 in Port Neill: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 30–34 in Kimba: 2.1% males, 3.3% females; 30–34 in Port Neill: 2.1% males, 2.8% females
- 25–29 in Kimba: 2.8% males, 3.6% females; 25–29 in Port Neill: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 20–24 in Kimba: 1.6% males, 2.4% females; 20–24 in Port Neill: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 15–19 in Kimba: 2.0% males, 0.8% females; 15–19 in Port Neill: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 10–14 in Kimba: 4.1% males, 2.4% females; 10–14 in Port Neill: 2.1% males, 4.9% females
- 5–9 in Kimba: 2.1% males, 3.3% females; 5–9 in Port Neill: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 0–4 in Kimba: 2.1% males, 1.6% females; 0–4 in Port Neill: 2.8% males, 0.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $493
- First area, 2016: $561
- First area, 2021: $728
- Second area, 2011: $367
- Second area, 2016: $456
- Second area, 2021: $604
- First area, 2011: $805
- First area, 2016: $1,135
- First area, 2021: $1,234
- Second area, 2011: $696
- Second area, 2016: $866
- Second area, 2021: $774
- First area, 2011: $1,234
- First area, 2016: $1,366
- First area, 2021: $1,687
- Second area, 2011: $804
- Second area, 2016: $887
- Second area, 2021: $1,625
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.1
- First area, 2016: 2.1
- First area, 2021: 2.1
- Second area, 2011: 2.0
- Second area, 2016: 2.0
- Second area, 2021: 1.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $135
- First area, 2021: $139
- Second area, 2016: $200
- Second area, 2021: $194
- First area, 2011: $607
- First area, 2016: $728
- First area, 2021: $852
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $867
- Second area, 2021: $1,250
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.60
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Kimba with nearby areas
Compare Port Neill with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Kimba vs Port Neill [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL421019/kimba/vs/UCL422043/port-neill