Compare
Balaklava vs Port Wakefield
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 25 km apart · Balaklava profile · Port Wakefield profile
Balaklava Port Wakefield
Balaklava and Port Wakefield (L) are nearby South Australian towns with very different social profiles. Port Wakefield (L) is far more diverse, with 23.8% of people born overseas and 17.9% using another language at home, compared to 9.0% and 4.0% in Balaklava. This is reflected in the workforce, where manufacturing is much more common in Port Wakefield (L), while Balaklava has more people in education and health. Balaklava is a more active hub for volunteering, with 29.5% of residents helping out, and it has more large homes, with 77.5% having three or more bedrooms.
Since 2011, the two areas have drifted further apart in several key ways. The gap in overseas births and language use has widened, while the difference in rental rates has flipped, with renting now far more common in Port Wakefield (L). Despite these shifts, they share a similar cost of living, with typical weekly household incomes around $1,100 and typical rents near $225. They also have a similar share of children under 15. While Balaklava is mostly car-dependent, Port Wakefield (L) is very walkable, with nearly all homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 1,827
- First area, 2016: 1,902
- First area, 2021: 1,956
- Second area, 2011: 915
- Second area, 2016: 671
- Second area, 2021: 593
- First area, 2011: 45 yrs
- First area, 2016: 47 yrs
- First area, 2021: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 42 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 53 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 43 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Balaklava: 1.6% males, 3.6% females; 85+ in Port Wakefield: 0.0% males, 1.2% females
- 80–84 in Balaklava: 1.8% males, 1.7% females; 80–84 in Port Wakefield: 1.4% males, 1.9% females
- 75–79 in Balaklava: 2.5% males, 3.5% females; 75–79 in Port Wakefield: 2.2% males, 1.9% females
- 70–74 in Balaklava: 2.7% males, 3.3% females; 70–74 in Port Wakefield: 3.2% males, 2.9% females
- 65–69 in Balaklava: 4.4% males, 3.5% females; 65–69 in Port Wakefield: 3.1% males, 3.6% females
- 60–64 in Balaklava: 2.7% males, 3.0% females; 60–64 in Port Wakefield: 4.2% males, 3.1% females
- 55–59 in Balaklava: 3.5% males, 3.3% females; 55–59 in Port Wakefield: 3.7% males, 3.2% females
- 50–54 in Balaklava: 2.7% males, 3.4% females; 50–54 in Port Wakefield: 2.7% males, 3.2% females
- 45–49 in Balaklava: 2.7% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Port Wakefield: 3.7% males, 3.1% females
- 40–44 in Balaklava: 2.2% males, 2.0% females; 40–44 in Port Wakefield: 2.5% males, 2.4% females
- 35–39 in Balaklava: 1.8% males, 2.3% females; 35–39 in Port Wakefield: 3.7% males, 2.7% females
- 30–34 in Balaklava: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 30–34 in Port Wakefield: 2.5% males, 4.9% females
- 25–29 in Balaklava: 2.7% males, 2.5% females; 25–29 in Port Wakefield: 4.4% males, 2.4% females
- 20–24 in Balaklava: 2.3% males, 2.3% females; 20–24 in Port Wakefield: 2.2% males, 3.1% females
- 15–19 in Balaklava: 2.4% males, 3.0% females; 15–19 in Port Wakefield: 2.2% males, 2.5% females
- 10–14 in Balaklava: 3.0% males, 2.9% females; 10–14 in Port Wakefield: 3.6% males, 2.7% females
- 5–9 in Balaklava: 3.6% males, 3.5% females; 5–9 in Port Wakefield: 1.4% males, 3.7% females
- 0–4 in Balaklava: 3.2% males, 2.3% females; 0–4 in Port Wakefield: 2.5% males, 2.4% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $443
- First area, 2016: $531
- First area, 2021: $611
- Second area, 2011: $547
- Second area, 2016: $487
- Second area, 2021: $698
- First area, 2011: $809
- First area, 2016: $963
- First area, 2021: $1,066
- Second area, 2011: $888
- Second area, 2016: $949
- Second area, 2021: $1,119
- First area, 2011: $1,036
- First area, 2016: $1,311
- First area, 2021: $1,443
- Second area, 2011: $1,218
- Second area, 2016: $1,307
- Second area, 2021: $1,433
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.2
- First area, 2016: 2.2
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.2
- Second area, 2021: 2.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $200
- First area, 2021: $229
- Second area, 2016: $150
- Second area, 2021: $225
- First area, 2011: $1,040
- First area, 2016: $900
- First area, 2021: $984
- Second area, 2011: $1,083
- Second area, 2016: $1,160
- Second area, 2021: $867
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Balaklava with nearby areas
Compare Port Wakefield with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Balaklava vs Port Wakefield [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL415003/balaklava/vs/UCL421032/port-wakefield