Compare
Port Augusta vs Roxby Downs
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 231 km apart · Port Augusta profile · Roxby Downs profile
Port Augusta Roxby Downs
Roxby Downs and Port Augusta are two distinct South Australian hubs with very different social and economic profiles. Roxby Downs is a much younger area where the typical resident is 30, compared to 38 in Port Augusta. It is also significantly wealthier; the typical weekly household income in Roxby Downs is $3,142, which is far higher than the $1,242 seen in Port Augusta. While Roxby Downs has a high share of residents who finished Year 12 (50.0%), Port Augusta has a far higher Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population at 21.5%, compared to 5.2% in Roxby Downs.
The gap in household income has widened sharply since 2011, with the difference growing from $59 to $1,900. Despite this, the two areas share some similarities, such as having similar proportions of people who use another language at home. They also both have a high share of homes with three or more bedrooms. In terms of accessibility, Port Augusta is somewhat walkable and has many people within a short walk of public transport, whereas Roxby Downs is mostly car-dependent.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 15,967
- First area, 2016: 16,804
- First area, 2021: 12,788
- Second area, 2011: 1,005
- Second area, 2016: 4,324
- Second area, 2021: 3,671
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 30 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Port Augusta: 0.8% males, 1.2% females; 85+ in Roxby Downs: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Port Augusta: 1.1% males, 1.2% females; 80–84 in Roxby Downs: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Port Augusta: 1.7% males, 1.8% females; 75–79 in Roxby Downs: 0.2% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Port Augusta: 2.6% males, 2.4% females; 70–74 in Roxby Downs: 0.2% males, 0.2% females
- 65–69 in Port Augusta: 2.5% males, 2.5% females; 65–69 in Roxby Downs: 0.5% males, 0.4% females
- 60–64 in Port Augusta: 3.3% males, 3.0% females; 60–64 in Roxby Downs: 1.8% males, 1.6% females
- 55–59 in Port Augusta: 3.3% males, 3.4% females; 55–59 in Roxby Downs: 3.0% males, 2.0% females
- 50–54 in Port Augusta: 2.9% males, 3.3% females; 50–54 in Roxby Downs: 3.4% males, 2.4% females
- 45–49 in Port Augusta: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 45–49 in Roxby Downs: 3.7% males, 3.0% females
- 40–44 in Port Augusta: 2.8% males, 2.6% females; 40–44 in Roxby Downs: 4.3% males, 3.3% females
- 35–39 in Port Augusta: 3.7% males, 3.0% females; 35–39 in Roxby Downs: 5.8% males, 5.0% females
- 30–34 in Port Augusta: 4.4% males, 3.3% females; 30–34 in Roxby Downs: 5.5% males, 5.6% females
- 25–29 in Port Augusta: 4.2% males, 3.7% females; 25–29 in Roxby Downs: 4.4% males, 5.2% females
- 20–24 in Port Augusta: 3.1% males, 2.6% females; 20–24 in Roxby Downs: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
- 15–19 in Port Augusta: 2.9% males, 2.6% females; 15–19 in Roxby Downs: 2.7% males, 2.3% females
- 10–14 in Port Augusta: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 10–14 in Roxby Downs: 3.9% males, 3.5% females
- 5–9 in Port Augusta: 3.1% males, 3.1% females; 5–9 in Roxby Downs: 4.9% males, 5.5% females
- 0–4 in Port Augusta: 3.1% males, 2.8% females; 0–4 in Roxby Downs: 4.6% males, 5.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $448
- First area, 2016: $514
- First area, 2021: $687
- Second area, 2011: $445
- Second area, 2016: $676
- Second area, 2021: $1,747
- First area, 2011: $801
- First area, 2016: $927
- First area, 2021: $1,242
- Second area, 2011: $742
- Second area, 2016: $1,226
- Second area, 2021: $3,142
- First area, 2011: $985
- First area, 2016: $1,173
- First area, 2021: $1,608
- Second area, 2011: $1,079
- Second area, 2016: $1,635
- Second area, 2021: $3,467
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.2
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $220
- First area, 2021: $200
- Second area, 2016: $273
- Second area, 2021: $260
- First area, 2011: $1,200
- First area, 2016: $1,161
- First area, 2021: $1,083
- Second area, 2011: $1,116
- Second area, 2016: $1,400
- Second area, 2021: $1,517
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Port Augusta with nearby areas
Compare Roxby Downs with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Port Augusta vs Roxby Downs [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL413003/port-augusta/vs/UCL415039/roxby-downs