Compare
Kingsthorpe vs Oakey
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 12 km apart · Kingsthorpe profile · Oakey profile
Kingsthorpe Oakey
Oakey and Kingsthorpe are two nearby Queensland areas with distinct social and economic profiles. Oakey has a far higher share of renters (36.1% compared to 15.4% in Kingsthorpe) and a much larger proportion of one-parent families (24.3% versus 12.0%). Its layout is more walkable for daily needs, with 47.1% of homes within a 15 minute walk of groceries, while Kingsthorpe has none. Kingsthorpe is wealthier, with a typical weekly household income of $1,636, which is well higher than the $1,209 seen in Oakey.
Both areas are very similar in how they get around and work, with nearly identical rates of full-time employment and no residents using public transport to commute. This shared reliance on cars is reflected in their similar street connectivity. While Kingsthorpe has a younger typical age of 35 compared to 41 in Oakey, this gap has narrowed since 2011. Other differences, such as the share of people living alone or those with a mortgage, have also shifted over time as the two areas evolve.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 4,634
- First area, 2016: 1,679
- First area, 2021: 2,012
- Second area, 2011: 1,055
- Second area, 2016: 4,194
- Second area, 2021: 4,319
- First area, 2011: 30 yrs
- First area, 2016: 47 yrs
- First area, 2021: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Kingsthorpe: 0.5% males, 0.6% females; 85+ in Oakey: 1.1% males, 1.6% females
- 80–84 in Kingsthorpe: 0.9% males, 0.7% females; 80–84 in Oakey: 1.5% males, 1.5% females
- 75–79 in Kingsthorpe: 1.4% males, 1.2% females; 75–79 in Oakey: 1.8% males, 2.2% females
- 70–74 in Kingsthorpe: 1.3% males, 1.8% females; 70–74 in Oakey: 2.3% males, 2.1% females
- 65–69 in Kingsthorpe: 2.9% males, 2.0% females; 65–69 in Oakey: 3.2% males, 3.0% females
- 60–64 in Kingsthorpe: 2.4% males, 2.8% females; 60–64 in Oakey: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 55–59 in Kingsthorpe: 2.8% males, 3.3% females; 55–59 in Oakey: 2.6% males, 2.9% females
- 50–54 in Kingsthorpe: 3.8% males, 4.2% females; 50–54 in Oakey: 3.4% males, 3.7% females
- 45–49 in Kingsthorpe: 2.7% males, 2.9% females; 45–49 in Oakey: 2.8% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in Kingsthorpe: 2.4% males, 2.5% females; 40–44 in Oakey: 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 35–39 in Kingsthorpe: 3.8% males, 4.2% females; 35–39 in Oakey: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
- 30–34 in Kingsthorpe: 3.9% males, 3.2% females; 30–34 in Oakey: 2.9% males, 2.5% females
- 25–29 in Kingsthorpe: 3.4% males, 3.5% females; 25–29 in Oakey: 2.4% males, 2.9% females
- 20–24 in Kingsthorpe: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 20–24 in Oakey: 3.1% males, 2.5% females
- 15–19 in Kingsthorpe: 2.9% males, 2.4% females; 15–19 in Oakey: 3.7% males, 2.8% females
- 10–14 in Kingsthorpe: 4.4% males, 3.8% females; 10–14 in Oakey: 3.5% males, 3.8% females
- 5–9 in Kingsthorpe: 4.0% males, 4.7% females; 5–9 in Oakey: 3.7% males, 3.5% females
- 0–4 in Kingsthorpe: 3.7% males, 4.3% females; 0–4 in Oakey: 2.7% males, 3.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $658
- First area, 2016: $466
- First area, 2021: $786
- Second area, 2011: $503
- Second area, 2016: $610
- Second area, 2021: $638
- First area, 2011: $1,650
- First area, 2016: $846
- First area, 2021: $1,636
- Second area, 2011: $866
- Second area, 2016: $1,285
- Second area, 2021: $1,209
- First area, 2011: $1,626
- First area, 2016: $1,027
- First area, 2021: $1,797
- Second area, 2011: $972
- Second area, 2016: $1,480
- Second area, 2021: $1,465
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.5
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.1
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $228
- First area, 2021: $310
- Second area, 2016: $370
- Second area, 2021: $265
- First area, 2011: $2,100
- First area, 2016: $1,430
- First area, 2021: $1,517
- Second area, 2011: $1,800
- Second area, 2016: $1,733
- Second area, 2021: $1,213
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Kingsthorpe with nearby areas
Compare Oakey with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Kingsthorpe vs Oakey [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL315047/kingsthorpe/vs/UCL315076/oakey