Compare
Bamaga vs Napranum
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 206 km apart · Bamaga profile · Napranum profile
Bamaga Napranum
Bamaga and Napranum (L) are two Queensland areas with very different profiles. Bamaga is more walkable, with a score of 4.6 (somewhat walkable), while Napranum (L) is 0.5 (car-dependent). Bamaga has a much more qualified workforce, with 54.0% of people completing Year 12 compared to 22.8% in Napranum (L). This is consistent with higher incomes in Bamaga, where the typical weekly household income is $1,625, far higher than the $788 seen in Napranum (L). Bamaga is also more linguistically diverse, with 70.8% of people using another language at home compared to 15.4% in Napranum (L).
Daily life in both places shares several similarities, such as a very high rental rate of around 93% and a typical weekly rent of about $120. Both areas also have a very young population, with children under 15 making up over a quarter of the residents in each. While they share these traits, other gaps have grown since 2011. The difference in weekly household income has widened significantly, and the gap in people working or looking for work has increased to 34.0% in Bamaga's favour.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 1,316
- First area, 2016: 4,618
- First area, 2021: 1,180
- Second area, 2011: 765
- Second area, 2016: 593
- Second area, 2021: 883
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 30 yrs
- First area, 2021: 25 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 40 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 27 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bamaga: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Napranum: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Bamaga: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Napranum: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Bamaga: 0.4% males, 0.3% females; 75–79 in Napranum: 0.0% males, 0.6% females
- 70–74 in Bamaga: 1.0% males, 0.0% females; 70–74 in Napranum: 1.1% males, 1.0% females
- 65–69 in Bamaga: 1.4% males, 1.3% females; 65–69 in Napranum: 1.3% males, 1.6% females
- 60–64 in Bamaga: 1.7% males, 2.2% females; 60–64 in Napranum: 2.1% males, 2.2% females
- 55–59 in Bamaga: 2.4% males, 2.3% females; 55–59 in Napranum: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
- 50–54 in Bamaga: 2.6% males, 2.8% females; 50–54 in Napranum: 2.9% males, 3.9% females
- 45–49 in Bamaga: 2.4% males, 2.3% females; 45–49 in Napranum: 2.2% males, 2.7% females
- 40–44 in Bamaga: 2.8% males, 3.3% females; 40–44 in Napranum: 3.8% males, 2.7% females
- 35–39 in Bamaga: 3.5% males, 3.2% females; 35–39 in Napranum: 3.5% males, 3.3% females
- 30–34 in Bamaga: 3.8% males, 4.1% females; 30–34 in Napranum: 3.3% males, 3.7% females
- 25–29 in Bamaga: 2.7% males, 4.0% females; 25–29 in Napranum: 2.7% males, 3.3% females
- 20–24 in Bamaga: 3.4% males, 4.8% females; 20–24 in Napranum: 4.0% males, 4.4% females
- 15–19 in Bamaga: 4.4% males, 4.4% females; 15–19 in Napranum: 5.1% males, 4.9% females
- 10–14 in Bamaga: 5.9% males, 4.9% females; 10–14 in Napranum: 4.0% males, 4.4% females
- 5–9 in Bamaga: 5.7% males, 6.0% females; 5–9 in Napranum: 6.0% males, 5.5% females
- 0–4 in Bamaga: 5.6% males, 4.4% females; 0–4 in Napranum: 4.3% males, 4.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $580
- First area, 2016: $1,098
- First area, 2021: $747
- Second area, 2011: $552
- Second area, 2016: $674
- Second area, 2021: $342
- First area, 2011: $1,052
- First area, 2016: $2,185
- First area, 2021: $1,625
- Second area, 2011: $988
- Second area, 2016: $1,279
- Second area, 2021: $788
- First area, 2011: $1,430
- First area, 2016: $2,415
- First area, 2021: $1,522
- Second area, 2011: $1,134
- Second area, 2016: $1,461
- Second area, 2021: $924
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 3.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 3.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $150
- First area, 2021: $120
- Second area, 2016: $273
- Second area, 2021: $121
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 1.30
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 1.30
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bamaga with nearby areas
Compare Napranum with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bamaga vs Napranum [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL315006/bamaga/vs/UCL321076/napranum