Compare
Tamborine Mountain vs Lower Beechmont
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 10 km apart · Tamborine Mountain profile · Lower Beechmont profile
Tamborine Mountain Lower Beechmont
Tamborine Mountain and Lower Beechmont (L) are nearby Queensland areas with very different resident profiles. Tamborine Mountain is far older, with a typical resident aged 50 and 27.2% of people aged 65 or over, compared to a typical age of 41 and 13.6% of seniors in Lower Beechmont (L). This age gap is reflected in home ownership, with 44.3% of Tamborine Mountain homes owned outright, which is far higher than the 27.4% in Lower Beechmont (L). Tamborine Mountain also has more walkable amenities and better street connectivity, though Lower Beechmont (L) has a much higher share of people working or looking for work (68.3% compared to 53.7%).
Both areas are almost identical when it comes to the typical weekly household income, which sits around $1,500. They also share similar rates of volunteering and the percentage of people who completed Year 12. While they have many commonalities, the gap in typical age has shifted since 2016, with Tamborine Mountain now the older of the two. Similarly, the gap in the number of children under 15 has narrowed over time, though it remains well higher in Lower Beechmont (L) at 20.9%.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 9,528
- First area, 2021: 8,001
- Second area, 2011: 1,180
- Second area, 2016: 621
- Second area, 2021: 828
- First area, 2016: 36 yrs
- First area, 2021: 50 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 58 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Tamborine Mountain: 1.1% males, 1.4% females; 85+ in Lower Beechmont: 0.4% males, 1.0% females
- 80–84 in Tamborine Mountain: 1.7% males, 1.8% females; 80–84 in Lower Beechmont: 0.9% males, 1.2% females
- 75–79 in Tamborine Mountain: 2.5% males, 2.9% females; 75–79 in Lower Beechmont: 1.0% males, 1.8% females
- 70–74 in Tamborine Mountain: 3.7% males, 3.8% females; 70–74 in Lower Beechmont: 3.2% males, 1.3% females
- 65–69 in Tamborine Mountain: 3.7% males, 4.6% females; 65–69 in Lower Beechmont: 2.0% males, 2.1% females
- 60–64 in Tamborine Mountain: 3.5% males, 4.3% females; 60–64 in Lower Beechmont: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 55–59 in Tamborine Mountain: 3.8% males, 4.3% females; 55–59 in Lower Beechmont: 4.3% males, 3.1% females
- 50–54 in Tamborine Mountain: 3.7% males, 4.3% females; 50–54 in Lower Beechmont: 4.3% males, 3.4% females
- 45–49 in Tamborine Mountain: 3.3% males, 3.4% females; 45–49 in Lower Beechmont: 3.7% males, 3.7% females
- 40–44 in Tamborine Mountain: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Lower Beechmont: 4.2% males, 4.9% females
- 35–39 in Tamborine Mountain: 2.2% males, 2.8% females; 35–39 in Lower Beechmont: 3.7% males, 3.8% females
- 30–34 in Tamborine Mountain: 1.6% males, 1.9% females; 30–34 in Lower Beechmont: 3.4% males, 3.7% females
- 25–29 in Tamborine Mountain: 1.5% males, 1.6% females; 25–29 in Lower Beechmont: 2.2% males, 3.2% females
- 20–24 in Tamborine Mountain: 1.7% males, 1.3% females; 20–24 in Lower Beechmont: 1.3% males, 1.6% females
- 15–19 in Tamborine Mountain: 2.8% males, 3.0% females; 15–19 in Lower Beechmont: 2.2% males, 2.6% females
- 10–14 in Tamborine Mountain: 3.6% males, 3.1% females; 10–14 in Lower Beechmont: 3.2% males, 2.8% females
- 5–9 in Tamborine Mountain: 2.6% males, 2.7% females; 5–9 in Lower Beechmont: 2.7% males, 4.3% females
- 0–4 in Tamborine Mountain: 2.2% males, 2.0% females; 0–4 in Lower Beechmont: 4.2% males, 2.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $743
- First area, 2021: $681
- Second area, 2011: $432
- Second area, 2016: $485
- Second area, 2021: $810
- First area, 2016: $1,935
- First area, 2021: $1,505
- Second area, 2011: $962
- Second area, 2016: $809
- Second area, 2021: $1,525
- First area, 2016: $2,171
- First area, 2021: $1,822
- Second area, 2011: $1,008
- Second area, 2016: $1,007
- Second area, 2021: $1,919
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 1.9
- Second area, 2021: 2.5
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $280
- First area, 2021: $420
- Second area, 2016: $260
- Second area, 2021: $400
- First area, 2016: $2,043
- First area, 2021: $1,800
- Second area, 2011: $1,325
- Second area, 2016: $1,517
- Second area, 2021: $1,730
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Tamborine Mountain with nearby areas
Compare Lower Beechmont with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Tamborine Mountain vs Lower Beechmont [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL314022/tamborine-mountain/vs/UCL321068/lower-beechmont