Compare
Mount Hotham vs Omeo
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 42 km apart · Mount Hotham profile · Omeo profile
Mount Hotham Omeo
Omeo (L) and Mount Hotham (L) are two sparsely populated areas in Victoria with very different profiles. Omeo (L) is much older, with a typical resident aged 54 and 26.0% of people aged 65 and over. In contrast, Mount Hotham (L) is far younger, with a typical age of 30 and only 4.7% of people aged 65 and over. Wealth and housing also differ sharply; Mount Hotham (L) has a far higher typical weekly household income of $2,107 and a high share of renters at 44.4%, while Omeo (L) typicals earn $1,100 and are more likely to own their homes outright (43.8%).
Both areas are almost identical in their tiny Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations. This shared trait sits alongside growing gaps in other areas. Since 2011, the age difference has widened significantly, and the gap in weekly income has grown to over $1,000. While Omeo (L) is mostly made up of separate houses, Mount Hotham (L) is dominated by flats and apartments, with 69.4% of its homes in that category.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 438
- First area, 2016: 396
- First area, 2021: 128
- Second area, 2011: 226
- Second area, 2016: 232
- Second area, 2021: 242
- First area, 2011: 50 yrs
- First area, 2016: 40 yrs
- First area, 2021: 30 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 54 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Mount Hotham: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Omeo: 1.2% males, 2.8% females
- 80–84 in Mount Hotham: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 80–84 in Omeo: 3.2% males, 2.8% females
- 75–79 in Mount Hotham: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 75–79 in Omeo: 3.6% males, 1.2% females
- 70–74 in Mount Hotham: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 70–74 in Omeo: 6.5% males, 2.4% females
- 65–69 in Mount Hotham: 0.0% males, 2.4% females; 65–69 in Omeo: 2.8% males, 4.0% females
- 60–64 in Mount Hotham: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 60–64 in Omeo: 4.9% males, 3.6% females
- 55–59 in Mount Hotham: 2.4% males, 0.0% females; 55–59 in Omeo: 2.8% males, 8.1% females
- 50–54 in Mount Hotham: 4.0% males, 2.4% females; 50–54 in Omeo: 5.7% males, 4.0% females
- 45–49 in Mount Hotham: 4.8% males, 5.6% females; 45–49 in Omeo: 0.0% males, 2.0% females
- 40–44 in Mount Hotham: 4.8% males, 0.0% females; 40–44 in Omeo: 1.6% males, 3.2% females
- 35–39 in Mount Hotham: 4.8% males, 2.4% females; 35–39 in Omeo: 1.6% males, 6.1% females
- 30–34 in Mount Hotham: 9.5% males, 2.4% females; 30–34 in Omeo: 3.2% males, 2.0% females
- 25–29 in Mount Hotham: 15.1% males, 7.1% females; 25–29 in Omeo: 1.2% males, 2.0% females
- 20–24 in Mount Hotham: 13.5% males, 11.1% females; 20–24 in Omeo: 2.0% males, 3.2% females
- 15–19 in Mount Hotham: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 15–19 in Omeo: 2.8% males, 2.0% females
- 10–14 in Mount Hotham: 2.4% males, 2.4% females; 10–14 in Omeo: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 5–9 in Mount Hotham: 0.0% males, 3.2% females; 5–9 in Omeo: 1.6% males, 1.6% females
- 0–4 in Mount Hotham: 0.0% males, 0.0% females; 0–4 in Omeo: 2.0% males, 1.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $487
- First area, 2016: $529
- First area, 2021: $963
- Second area, 2011: $531
- Second area, 2016: $655
- Second area, 2021: $669
- First area, 2011: $918
- First area, 2016: $1,025
- First area, 2021: $2,107
- Second area, 2011: $949
- Second area, 2016: $1,850
- Second area, 2021: $1,100
- First area, 2011: $979
- First area, 2016: $1,194
- First area, 2021: $2,437
- Second area, 2011: $1,028
- Second area, 2016: $2,083
- Second area, 2021: $1,531
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.2
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.2
- Second area, 2016: 3.2
- Second area, 2021: 1.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $230
- First area, 2021: $470
- Second area, 2021: $231
- First area, 2011: $1,050
- First area, 2016: $1,232
- First area, 2021: $834
- Second area, 2011: $1,150
- Second area, 2016: $1,668
- Second area, 2021: $1,127
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 1.10
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Mount Hotham with nearby areas
Compare Omeo with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Mount Hotham vs Omeo [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL222058/mount-hotham/vs/UCL222067/omeo