Compare
Batesford vs Little River
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 24 km apart · Batesford profile · Little River profile
Batesford Little River
Batesford (L) and Little River (L) are two Victorian areas with very different profiles. Batesford (L) has a more highly qualified and wealthier population, with 25.4% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher and 43.1% of households earning $3,000 or more a week. In contrast, Little River (L) is more walkable (somewhat walkable) than the car-dependent Batesford (L), and it has much better access to local services, with 100% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a school. Little River (L) also has a higher share of one-parent families (16.0% compared to 4.3%) and more residents with long-term health conditions.
Daily life is very similar in both places when it comes to housing, as both are almost entirely made up of separate houses and nearly every home has three or more bedrooms. However, the gap in wealth and education has widened significantly since 2011, with Batesford (L) seeing a sharp rise in high incomes and university degrees. While both areas have a low unemployment rate, Batesford (L) now has a much higher share of adults working or looking for work.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 511
- First area, 2016: 530
- First area, 2021: 1,139
- Second area, 2011: 216
- Second area, 2016: 321
- Second area, 2021: 292
- First area, 2011: 35 yrs
- First area, 2016: 37 yrs
- First area, 2021: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 44 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Batesford: 0.3% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Little River: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Batesford: 0.5% males, 0.3% females; 80–84 in Little River: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Batesford: 1.1% males, 1.1% females; 75–79 in Little River: 1.4% males, 1.1% females
- 70–74 in Batesford: 1.4% males, 2.0% females; 70–74 in Little River: 3.2% males, 5.0% females
- 65–69 in Batesford: 2.4% males, 2.1% females; 65–69 in Little River: 3.5% males, 2.5% females
- 60–64 in Batesford: 3.1% males, 2.3% females; 60–64 in Little River: 4.6% males, 2.8% females
- 55–59 in Batesford: 3.9% males, 3.7% females; 55–59 in Little River: 2.1% males, 4.6% females
- 50–54 in Batesford: 5.1% males, 4.2% females; 50–54 in Little River: 2.5% males, 2.5% females
- 45–49 in Batesford: 3.8% males, 4.5% females; 45–49 in Little River: 6.0% males, 5.7% females
- 40–44 in Batesford: 4.6% males, 3.5% females; 40–44 in Little River: 1.4% males, 3.5% females
- 35–39 in Batesford: 2.6% males, 3.1% females; 35–39 in Little River: 2.8% males, 3.2% females
- 30–34 in Batesford: 1.6% males, 1.6% females; 30–34 in Little River: 1.8% males, 1.4% females
- 25–29 in Batesford: 1.2% males, 1.0% females; 25–29 in Little River: 1.8% males, 1.4% females
- 20–24 in Batesford: 3.1% males, 3.2% females; 20–24 in Little River: 3.2% males, 3.5% females
- 15–19 in Batesford: 4.3% males, 4.7% females; 15–19 in Little River: 4.3% males, 2.5% females
- 10–14 in Batesford: 5.9% males, 4.7% females; 10–14 in Little River: 6.7% males, 5.0% females
- 5–9 in Batesford: 4.5% males, 4.7% females; 5–9 in Little River: 2.8% males, 3.2% females
- 0–4 in Batesford: 1.8% males, 2.1% females; 0–4 in Little River: 2.5% males, 1.4% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $523
- First area, 2016: $662
- First area, 2021: $956
- Second area, 2011: $477
- Second area, 2016: $503
- Second area, 2021: $775
- First area, 2011: $1,106
- First area, 2016: $1,388
- First area, 2021: $2,851
- Second area, 2011: $1,485
- Second area, 2016: $1,083
- Second area, 2021: $2,062
- First area, 2011: $1,312
- First area, 2016: $1,639
- First area, 2021: $2,881
- Second area, 2011: $1,392
- Second area, 2016: $1,297
- Second area, 2021: $2,166
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 3.3
- Second area, 2011: 3.2
- Second area, 2016: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $260
- First area, 2021: $350
- Second area, 2016: $190
- Second area, 2021: $420
- First area, 2011: $1,160
- First area, 2016: $1,200
- First area, 2021: $2,268
- Second area, 2011: $1,688
- Second area, 2016: $1,083
- Second area, 2021: $1,900
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Batesford with nearby areas
Compare Little River with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Batesford vs Little River [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL221004/batesford/vs/UCL222045/little-river