Compare
Red Cliffs vs Nichols Point
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 8.5 km apart · Red Cliffs profile · Nichols Point profile
Red Cliffs Nichols Point
Red Cliffs and Nichols Point (L) are neighbouring areas in Victoria with very different social profiles. Nichols Point (L) has a much higher proportion of university-qualified adults (25.7% compared to 7.0% in Red Cliffs) and typical weekly household incomes that are far higher at $2,739, against $1,081 in Red Cliffs. In contrast, Red Cliffs has a much larger share of people aged 65 and over (22.1% versus 8.9%) and a higher rate of renters, at 30.9% compared to just 3.5% in Nichols Point (L).
Everyday life in both places is similar in that people per bedroom is the same (0.80) and about a third of residents in each area moved home in the last five years. However, the gaps between them are shifting; the difference in typical incomes and education levels has grown significantly since 2011. Red Cliffs is also much more accessible on foot, described as very walkable, while Nichols Point (L) is car-dependent.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 3,678
- First area, 2016: 2,154
- First area, 2021: 3,070
- Second area, 2011: 500
- Second area, 2016: 837
- Second area, 2021: 660
- First area, 2011: 37 yrs
- First area, 2016: 35 yrs
- First area, 2021: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 59 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 36 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Red Cliffs: 1.3% males, 2.8% females; 85+ in Nichols Point: 0.6% males, 0.4% females
- 80–84 in Red Cliffs: 1.3% males, 1.6% females; 80–84 in Nichols Point: 0.7% males, 0.4% females
- 75–79 in Red Cliffs: 1.9% males, 1.9% females; 75–79 in Nichols Point: 1.3% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Red Cliffs: 2.5% males, 3.0% females; 70–74 in Nichols Point: 1.3% males, 1.0% females
- 65–69 in Red Cliffs: 2.8% males, 2.9% females; 65–69 in Nichols Point: 2.4% males, 0.9% females
- 60–64 in Red Cliffs: 3.0% males, 3.2% females; 60–64 in Nichols Point: 1.9% males, 3.0% females
- 55–59 in Red Cliffs: 3.0% males, 3.0% females; 55–59 in Nichols Point: 2.2% males, 3.1% females
- 50–54 in Red Cliffs: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 50–54 in Nichols Point: 3.6% males, 4.0% females
- 45–49 in Red Cliffs: 2.8% males, 2.6% females; 45–49 in Nichols Point: 4.0% males, 3.7% females
- 40–44 in Red Cliffs: 2.6% males, 2.7% females; 40–44 in Nichols Point: 4.9% males, 4.9% females
- 35–39 in Red Cliffs: 2.9% males, 2.9% females; 35–39 in Nichols Point: 3.9% males, 4.2% females
- 30–34 in Red Cliffs: 3.2% males, 3.1% females; 30–34 in Nichols Point: 2.2% males, 3.1% females
- 25–29 in Red Cliffs: 3.5% males, 3.3% females; 25–29 in Nichols Point: 1.6% males, 1.6% females
- 20–24 in Red Cliffs: 2.8% males, 2.7% females; 20–24 in Nichols Point: 2.4% males, 0.7% females
- 15–19 in Red Cliffs: 2.5% males, 3.3% females; 15–19 in Nichols Point: 2.2% males, 3.3% females
- 10–14 in Red Cliffs: 3.7% males, 3.2% females; 10–14 in Nichols Point: 6.0% males, 5.4% females
- 5–9 in Red Cliffs: 3.4% males, 2.5% females; 5–9 in Nichols Point: 3.4% males, 6.6% females
- 0–4 in Red Cliffs: 3.0% males, 2.8% females; 0–4 in Nichols Point: 4.2% males, 4.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $584
- First area, 2016: $501
- First area, 2021: $616
- Second area, 2011: $439
- Second area, 2016: $566
- Second area, 2021: $1,164
- First area, 2011: $1,357
- First area, 2016: $969
- First area, 2021: $1,081
- Second area, 2011: $870
- Second area, 2016: $1,218
- Second area, 2021: $2,739
- First area, 2011: $1,535
- First area, 2016: $1,152
- First area, 2021: $1,419
- Second area, 2011: $917
- Second area, 2016: $1,388
- Second area, 2021: $2,874
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2011: 2.2
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 3.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $178
- First area, 2021: $250
- Second area, 2016: $210
- Second area, 2021: $390
- First area, 2011: $1,517
- First area, 2016: $1,083
- First area, 2021: $1,062
- Second area, 2011: $1,200
- Second area, 2016: $1,517
- Second area, 2021: $2,000
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Red Cliffs with nearby areas
Compare Nichols Point with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Red Cliffs vs Nichols Point [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL215070/red-cliffs/vs/UCL221055/nichols-point