Compare
Foster vs Fish Creek
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 11 km apart · Foster profile · Fish Creek profile
Foster Fish Creek
Foster and Fish Creek (L) are nearby Victorian towns with very different profiles. Foster is far older, with a typical resident aged 62 and 45.5% of the population aged 65 and over. It also has much higher rates of long-term health conditions (46.4%) and people living alone (48.2%). In contrast, Fish Creek (L) has a more qualified workforce, with 24.7% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher compared to 14.1% in Foster. Housing also differs, as every home in Fish Creek (L) is a separate house, while Foster has a higher share of renters (26.3%) and more apartments.
Both areas are very similar in a few key ways, such as the typical monthly home-loan payment and the share of people earning $2,000 or more a week. However, several gaps have widened since 2011. The age gap has grown to 11 years, and the difference in university qualifications has increased. While both are more walkable than the national figure, Foster is very walkable and is far more likely to have groceries and health services within a 15-minute walk.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 1,276
- First area, 2016: 1,164
- First area, 2021: 1,308
- Second area, 2011: 244
- Second area, 2016: 444
- Second area, 2021: 207
- First area, 2011: 45 yrs
- First area, 2016: 60 yrs
- First area, 2021: 62 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 51 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Foster: 3.8% males, 5.1% females; 85+ in Fish Creek: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Foster: 2.9% males, 3.7% females; 80–84 in Fish Creek: 2.0% males, 2.4% females
- 75–79 in Foster: 4.1% males, 5.0% females; 75–79 in Fish Creek: 3.4% males, 1.5% females
- 70–74 in Foster: 3.9% males, 5.9% females; 70–74 in Fish Creek: 4.4% males, 5.9% females
- 65–69 in Foster: 5.0% males, 5.6% females; 65–69 in Fish Creek: 1.5% males, 7.3% females
- 60–64 in Foster: 3.6% males, 4.4% females; 60–64 in Fish Creek: 2.4% males, 2.4% females
- 55–59 in Foster: 2.9% males, 3.3% females; 55–59 in Fish Creek: 2.0% males, 2.4% females
- 50–54 in Foster: 2.1% males, 2.5% females; 50–54 in Fish Creek: 4.9% males, 5.4% females
- 45–49 in Foster: 2.6% males, 2.3% females; 45–49 in Fish Creek: 4.4% males, 2.9% females
- 40–44 in Foster: 1.9% males, 2.0% females; 40–44 in Fish Creek: 4.9% males, 2.0% females
- 35–39 in Foster: 2.2% males, 1.7% females; 35–39 in Fish Creek: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
- 30–34 in Foster: 1.5% males, 1.3% females; 30–34 in Fish Creek: 0.0% males, 1.5% females
- 25–29 in Foster: 1.9% males, 1.3% females; 25–29 in Fish Creek: 1.5% males, 1.5% females
- 20–24 in Foster: 1.7% males, 1.8% females; 20–24 in Fish Creek: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
- 15–19 in Foster: 1.5% males, 2.4% females; 15–19 in Fish Creek: 2.4% males, 1.5% females
- 10–14 in Foster: 2.0% males, 2.3% females; 10–14 in Fish Creek: 2.0% males, 4.9% females
- 5–9 in Foster: 2.4% males, 1.1% females; 5–9 in Fish Creek: 4.4% males, 3.9% females
- 0–4 in Foster: 1.3% males, 1.1% females; 0–4 in Fish Creek: 1.5% males, 1.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $402
- First area, 2016: $463
- First area, 2021: $529
- Second area, 2011: $549
- Second area, 2016: $586
- Second area, 2021: $626
- First area, 2011: $722
- First area, 2016: $742
- First area, 2021: $846
- Second area, 2011: $1,125
- Second area, 2016: $1,346
- Second area, 2021: $955
- First area, 2011: $1,003
- First area, 2016: $1,060
- First area, 2021: $1,327
- Second area, 2011: $1,281
- Second area, 2016: $1,489
- Second area, 2021: $1,562
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.2
- First area, 2016: 1.9
- First area, 2021: 1.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.2
- Second area, 2016: 2.8
- Second area, 2021: 2.1
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $200
- First area, 2021: $240
- Second area, 2016: $260
- Second area, 2021: $250
- First area, 2011: $1,116
- First area, 2016: $1,181
- First area, 2021: $1,213
- Second area, 2011: $702
- Second area, 2016: $1,300
- Second area, 2021: $1,192
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Foster with nearby areas
Compare Fish Creek with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Foster vs Fish Creek [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL215034/foster/vs/UCL222025/fish-creek