Compare
Portland vs Casterton
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 88 km apart · Portland profile · Casterton profile
Portland Casterton
Portland (Vic.) and Casterton are two Victorian towns with different demographic profiles. Casterton is far older, with a typical resident aged 59 compared to 47 in Portland (Vic.). This is reflected in the share of seniors, which is far higher in Casterton at 39.1% versus 25.0% in Portland (Vic.). Living arrangements also differ; Casterton has a far higher share of people living alone (43.6%) and homes owned outright (55.1%). Meanwhile, Portland (Vic.) has a far higher proportion of adults working or looking for work (52.3% compared to 41.2%) and a higher typical weekly household income of $1,159, which is well higher than the $845 seen in Casterton.
The gap in typical age between the two areas has widened since 2011, growing from 7 to 12 years. Despite this, they share some common ground, such as similar rates of university qualifications and very similar shares of people who served in the Defence Force. Both areas are also somewhat walkable, and they have nearly identical rates of unemployment and full-time employment. In both places, the typical household income remains well below the national figure.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 13,339
- First area, 2016: 18,205
- First area, 2021: 10,450
- Second area, 2011: 1,566
- Second area, 2016: 1,345
- Second area, 2021: 1,336
- First area, 2011: 37 yrs
- First area, 2016: 42 yrs
- First area, 2021: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 56 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 59 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Portland: 1.1% males, 2.0% females; 85+ in Casterton: 2.3% males, 5.4% females
- 80–84 in Portland: 1.5% males, 1.8% females; 80–84 in Casterton: 2.8% males, 3.5% females
- 75–79 in Portland: 2.0% males, 2.2% females; 75–79 in Casterton: 3.0% males, 4.7% females
- 70–74 in Portland: 3.5% males, 3.0% females; 70–74 in Casterton: 4.8% males, 3.6% females
- 65–69 in Portland: 3.7% males, 4.1% females; 65–69 in Casterton: 4.7% males, 5.1% females
- 60–64 in Portland: 3.7% males, 4.2% females; 60–64 in Casterton: 4.2% males, 4.7% females
- 55–59 in Portland: 3.8% males, 3.7% females; 55–59 in Casterton: 3.8% males, 4.7% females
- 50–54 in Portland: 3.4% males, 3.0% females; 50–54 in Casterton: 1.7% males, 2.3% females
- 45–49 in Portland: 3.0% males, 3.5% females; 45–49 in Casterton: 2.1% males, 2.2% females
- 40–44 in Portland: 2.5% males, 2.8% females; 40–44 in Casterton: 1.6% males, 1.5% females
- 35–39 in Portland: 2.5% males, 3.0% females; 35–39 in Casterton: 1.4% males, 2.1% females
- 30–34 in Portland: 2.0% males, 2.5% females; 30–34 in Casterton: 1.3% males, 1.8% females
- 25–29 in Portland: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 25–29 in Casterton: 2.7% males, 1.9% females
- 20–24 in Portland: 2.6% males, 2.2% females; 20–24 in Casterton: 2.0% males, 2.5% females
- 15–19 in Portland: 3.0% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Casterton: 2.0% males, 2.0% females
- 10–14 in Portland: 2.9% males, 2.9% females; 10–14 in Casterton: 2.0% males, 2.3% females
- 5–9 in Portland: 2.8% males, 2.7% females; 5–9 in Casterton: 2.0% males, 1.4% females
- 0–4 in Portland: 2.3% males, 2.2% females; 0–4 in Casterton: 2.0% males, 1.7% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $681
- First area, 2016: $702
- First area, 2021: $621
- Second area, 2011: $442
- Second area, 2016: $459
- Second area, 2021: $506
- First area, 2011: $1,443
- First area, 2016: $1,492
- First area, 2021: $1,159
- Second area, 2011: $920
- Second area, 2016: $730
- Second area, 2021: $845
- First area, 2011: $1,726
- First area, 2016: $1,850
- First area, 2021: $1,498
- Second area, 2011: $1,136
- Second area, 2016: $1,024
- Second area, 2021: $1,222
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.2
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.0
- Second area, 2021: 1.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $340
- First area, 2021: $250
- Second area, 2016: $130
- Second area, 2021: $160
- First area, 2011: $2,000
- First area, 2016: $1,733
- First area, 2021: $1,083
- Second area, 2011: $997
- Second area, 2016: $758
- Second area, 2021: $684
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Portland with nearby areas
Compare Casterton with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Portland vs Casterton [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL213012/portland/vs/UCL215020/casterton