Compare
Coomba Park vs Nabiac
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 18 km apart · Coomba Park profile · Nabiac profile
Coomba Park Nabiac
Nabiac and Coomba Park are nearby areas with very different profiles. Nabiac is a very walkable area where the typical resident is 43 and 20.1% of the population are children. In contrast, Coomba Park is car-dependent and much older, with a typical age of 62 and far more seniors at 39.4%. Nabiac also sees far more adults working or looking for work (53.2% vs 26.7%) and has a higher typical weekly household income of $1,276, compared with $757 in Coomba Park.
Both areas have a similar proportion of people with a bachelor degree or higher. However, many of the gaps between them have flipped since 2011. Residents in Coomba Park are now far older than those in Nabiac, and homes there are far more likely to be owned outright. Meanwhile, the share of people born overseas has grown more in Coomba Park, while the gap in typical incomes and mortgage payments has widened significantly.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 544
- First area, 2016: 565
- First area, 2021: 587
- Second area, 2011: 820
- Second area, 2016: 886
- Second area, 2021: 656
- First area, 2011: 36 yrs
- First area, 2016: 36 yrs
- First area, 2021: 62 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 44 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 43 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Coomba Park: 1.0% males, 1.9% females; 85+ in Nabiac: 0.0% males, 1.8% females
- 80–84 in Coomba Park: 0.9% males, 0.5% females; 80–84 in Nabiac: 1.8% males, 0.6% females
- 75–79 in Coomba Park: 3.8% males, 1.9% females; 75–79 in Nabiac: 2.9% males, 2.6% females
- 70–74 in Coomba Park: 7.6% males, 6.8% females; 70–74 in Nabiac: 3.0% males, 4.4% females
- 65–69 in Coomba Park: 8.0% males, 7.3% females; 65–69 in Nabiac: 2.7% males, 3.8% females
- 60–64 in Coomba Park: 8.5% males, 7.5% females; 60–64 in Nabiac: 3.2% males, 3.5% females
- 55–59 in Coomba Park: 4.9% males, 6.1% females; 55–59 in Nabiac: 3.2% males, 3.9% females
- 50–54 in Coomba Park: 2.8% males, 3.1% females; 50–54 in Nabiac: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
- 45–49 in Coomba Park: 1.6% males, 1.7% females; 45–49 in Nabiac: 1.4% males, 3.2% females
- 40–44 in Coomba Park: 1.6% males, 2.1% females; 40–44 in Nabiac: 2.7% males, 3.2% females
- 35–39 in Coomba Park: 1.7% males, 1.2% females; 35–39 in Nabiac: 3.3% males, 2.4% females
- 30–34 in Coomba Park: 1.6% males, 1.4% females; 30–34 in Nabiac: 2.7% males, 2.9% females
- 25–29 in Coomba Park: 0.5% males, 0.5% females; 25–29 in Nabiac: 2.0% males, 2.9% females
- 20–24 in Coomba Park: 0.7% males, 0.5% females; 20–24 in Nabiac: 2.6% males, 1.8% females
- 15–19 in Coomba Park: 1.2% males, 1.2% females; 15–19 in Nabiac: 3.5% males, 2.6% females
- 10–14 in Coomba Park: 2.3% males, 1.2% females; 10–14 in Nabiac: 3.0% males, 3.2% females
- 5–9 in Coomba Park: 1.6% males, 1.9% females; 5–9 in Nabiac: 3.8% males, 4.8% females
- 0–4 in Coomba Park: 1.2% males, 1.7% females; 0–4 in Nabiac: 2.7% males, 2.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $588
- First area, 2016: $475
- First area, 2021: $412
- Second area, 2011: $563
- Second area, 2016: $677
- Second area, 2021: $568
- First area, 2011: $1,449
- First area, 2016: $1,042
- First area, 2021: $757
- Second area, 2011: $1,384
- Second area, 2016: $1,485
- Second area, 2021: $1,276
- First area, 2011: $1,462
- First area, 2016: $1,160
- First area, 2021: $911
- Second area, 2011: $1,558
- Second area, 2016: $1,699
- Second area, 2021: $1,370
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.0
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 1.9
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.6
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $270
- First area, 2021: $310
- Second area, 2016: $350
- Second area, 2021: $335
- First area, 2011: $2,500
- First area, 2016: $1,192
- First area, 2021: $874
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $1,509
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Coomba Park with nearby areas
Compare Nabiac with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Coomba Park vs Nabiac [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL121023/coomba-park/vs/UCL121087/nabiac