Compare
Lake Cathie vs King Creek
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 11 km apart · Lake Cathie profile · King Creek profile
Lake Cathie King Creek
Lake Cathie and King Creek (L) are nearby New South Wales areas with very different profiles. Lake Cathie is far older, with a typical resident aged 53 and 32.3% of people aged 65 or over. It is also more walkable, described as mostly car-dependent, with many residents within a 15-minute walk of parks and schools. In contrast, King Creek (L) is car-dependent and has a wealthier population; its typical weekly household income is $2,088, which is far higher than the $1,263 seen in Lake Cathie.
Both areas have a similar share of people born overseas, around 10%, which sits close to the national figure. While they share some common ground, the gaps between them are often widening. Since 2011, Lake Cathie has become much older compared to King Creek (L), and the difference in household incomes has grown significantly. King Creek (L) has also seen a sharp increase in the share of large homes with three or more bedrooms compared to Lake Cathie.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 2,873
- First area, 2016: 2,205
- First area, 2021: 4,049
- Second area, 2011: 562
- Second area, 2016: 676
- Second area, 2021: 1,863
- First area, 2011: 42 yrs
- First area, 2016: 52 yrs
- First area, 2021: 53 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 45 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Lake Cathie: 1.0% males, 1.0% females; 85+ in King Creek: 0.6% males, 0.5% females
- 80–84 in Lake Cathie: 1.7% males, 1.6% females; 80–84 in King Creek: 0.9% males, 0.9% females
- 75–79 in Lake Cathie: 3.7% males, 3.9% females; 75–79 in King Creek: 2.5% males, 1.8% females
- 70–74 in Lake Cathie: 5.0% males, 5.5% females; 70–74 in King Creek: 3.3% males, 3.0% females
- 65–69 in Lake Cathie: 4.4% males, 4.8% females; 65–69 in King Creek: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 60–64 in Lake Cathie: 3.4% males, 4.3% females; 60–64 in King Creek: 3.3% males, 3.6% females
- 55–59 in Lake Cathie: 3.4% males, 4.0% females; 55–59 in King Creek: 3.9% males, 4.1% females
- 50–54 in Lake Cathie: 3.5% males, 3.5% females; 50–54 in King Creek: 3.6% males, 4.9% females
- 45–49 in Lake Cathie: 2.4% males, 2.9% females; 45–49 in King Creek: 3.9% males, 4.4% females
- 40–44 in Lake Cathie: 1.9% males, 2.6% females; 40–44 in King Creek: 2.6% males, 3.2% females
- 35–39 in Lake Cathie: 2.2% males, 2.5% females; 35–39 in King Creek: 2.8% males, 2.8% females
- 30–34 in Lake Cathie: 1.6% males, 1.7% females; 30–34 in King Creek: 1.5% males, 2.6% females
- 25–29 in Lake Cathie: 1.5% males, 1.4% females; 25–29 in King Creek: 0.9% males, 1.4% females
- 20–24 in Lake Cathie: 2.1% males, 1.5% females; 20–24 in King Creek: 2.0% males, 1.7% females
- 15–19 in Lake Cathie: 2.7% males, 2.5% females; 15–19 in King Creek: 4.4% males, 3.8% females
- 10–14 in Lake Cathie: 3.2% males, 2.9% females; 10–14 in King Creek: 4.1% males, 3.6% females
- 5–9 in Lake Cathie: 2.8% males, 2.9% females; 5–9 in King Creek: 3.4% males, 3.0% females
- 0–4 in Lake Cathie: 2.1% males, 1.9% females; 0–4 in King Creek: 2.6% males, 2.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $462
- First area, 2016: $592
- First area, 2021: $654
- Second area, 2011: $433
- Second area, 2016: $680
- Second area, 2021: $721
- First area, 2011: $905
- First area, 2016: $1,150
- First area, 2021: $1,263
- Second area, 2011: $858
- Second area, 2016: $1,737
- Second area, 2021: $2,088
- First area, 2011: $1,067
- First area, 2016: $1,326
- First area, 2021: $1,476
- Second area, 2011: $968
- Second area, 2016: $1,766
- Second area, 2021: $2,192
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.3
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 3.1
- Second area, 2021: 3.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $330
- First area, 2021: $380
- Second area, 2016: $385
- Second area, 2021: $410
- First area, 2011: $1,733
- First area, 2016: $1,451
- First area, 2021: $1,842
- Second area, 2011: $1,800
- Second area, 2016: $1,733
- Second area, 2021: $2,167
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Lake Cathie with nearby areas
Compare King Creek with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Lake Cathie vs King Creek [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL115096/lake-cathie/vs/UCL121058/king-creek