Compare
Bundeena vs Otford
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 20 km apart · Bundeena profile · Otford profile
Bundeena Otford
Bundeena and Otford (L) are two nearby New South Wales areas with very different profiles. Bundeena is a very walkable place where most residents can walk to groceries and health services within 15 minutes. It is much older, with a typical resident aged 50 and 23.5% of people aged 65 and over. In contrast, Otford (L) is mostly car-dependent and much younger; its typical resident is 41. Otford (L) also has significantly higher incomes, with a typical household earning $2,833 a week compared to $1,832 in Bundeena.
Both areas are similar in that they have a roughly equal share of people who provide unpaid care, at around 15%. This common ground exists alongside widening gaps in other areas, such as income and age. Since 2011, the gap in typical ages has flipped, and Otford (L) now has a much higher share of people working from home and adults with a bachelor degree or higher. While Bundeena remains more connected with more intersections and a higher share of homes owned outright, Otford (L) has seen a sharp increase in the proportion of high earners.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 1,118
- First area, 2016: 1,715
- First area, 2021: 2,103
- Second area, 2011: 253
- Second area, 2016: 209
- Second area, 2021: 321
- First area, 2011: 48 yrs
- First area, 2016: 32 yrs
- First area, 2021: 50 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 52 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 53 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bundeena: 0.8% males, 1.0% females; 85+ in Otford: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Bundeena: 1.2% males, 1.2% females; 80–84 in Otford: 0.9% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Bundeena: 2.7% males, 2.4% females; 75–79 in Otford: 1.3% males, 1.9% females
- 70–74 in Bundeena: 3.6% males, 3.8% females; 70–74 in Otford: 1.6% males, 0.0% females
- 65–69 in Bundeena: 4.1% males, 3.6% females; 65–69 in Otford: 1.6% males, 2.2% females
- 60–64 in Bundeena: 5.0% males, 4.5% females; 60–64 in Otford: 4.4% males, 3.4% females
- 55–59 in Bundeena: 4.3% males, 5.1% females; 55–59 in Otford: 7.2% males, 4.4% females
- 50–54 in Bundeena: 3.3% males, 4.1% females; 50–54 in Otford: 1.9% males, 3.4% females
- 45–49 in Bundeena: 2.8% males, 4.3% females; 45–49 in Otford: 5.0% males, 4.4% females
- 40–44 in Bundeena: 2.6% males, 2.3% females; 40–44 in Otford: 4.4% males, 5.3% females
- 35–39 in Bundeena: 2.5% males, 2.6% females; 35–39 in Otford: 4.4% males, 4.1% females
- 30–34 in Bundeena: 1.8% males, 2.0% females; 30–34 in Otford: 0.9% males, 3.1% females
- 25–29 in Bundeena: 1.4% males, 1.3% females; 25–29 in Otford: 3.4% males, 1.3% females
- 20–24 in Bundeena: 1.6% males, 1.7% females; 20–24 in Otford: 2.8% males, 1.6% females
- 15–19 in Bundeena: 2.8% males, 2.6% females; 15–19 in Otford: 2.5% males, 0.0% females
- 10–14 in Bundeena: 2.6% males, 3.0% females; 10–14 in Otford: 5.3% males, 1.9% females
- 5–9 in Bundeena: 4.1% males, 3.9% females; 5–9 in Otford: 3.4% males, 4.1% females
- 0–4 in Bundeena: 1.9% males, 1.7% females; 0–4 in Otford: 3.8% males, 4.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $395
- First area, 2016: $733
- First area, 2021: $812
- Second area, 2011: $456
- Second area, 2016: $518
- Second area, 2021: $1,268
- First area, 2011: $776
- First area, 2016: $1,792
- First area, 2021: $1,832
- Second area, 2011: $906
- Second area, 2016: $1,008
- Second area, 2021: $2,833
- First area, 2011: $956
- First area, 2016: $1,891
- First area, 2021: $2,156
- Second area, 2011: $1,017
- Second area, 2016: $1,136
- Second area, 2021: $3,291
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 3.1
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 1.9
- Second area, 2021: 2.9
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $363
- First area, 2021: $554
- Second area, 2016: $320
- Second area, 2021: $555
- First area, 2011: $1,083
- First area, 2016: $1,837
- First area, 2021: $2,600
- Second area, 2011: $1,950
- Second area, 2016: $1,300
- Second area, 2021: $2,650
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bundeena with nearby areas
Compare Otford with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bundeena vs Otford [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL115032/bundeena/vs/UCL122105/otford