Compare
Silverdale - Warragamba vs Luddenham
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 7.6 km apart · Silverdale - Warragamba profile · Luddenham profile
Silverdale - Warragamba Luddenham
Silverdale - Warragamba and Luddenham (L) are neighbouring areas with very different levels of accessibility. Luddenham (L) is very walkable, with every home within a 15-minute walk of a school and groceries, and 99.3% within reach of health services. In contrast, Silverdale - Warragamba is mostly car-dependent, with only 31.1% of homes near groceries and no homes within a 15-minute walk of health services. Silverdale - Warragamba has also seen more growth, with 35.2% of people moving in over the last five years compared to 20.6% in Luddenham (L).
These two areas share many similarities in their daily lives, including nearly identical numbers of people per home and a similar share of adults working or looking for work. While Luddenham (L) has a higher typical weekly rent of $520 compared to $408 in Silverdale - Warragamba, this gap has widened since 2016. Other differences are shifting too; the share of people aged 65 and over is now well higher in Luddenham (L), flipping a trend seen in 2011.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 6,372
- First area, 2016: 5,768
- First area, 2021: 5,364
- Second area, 2011: 237
- Second area, 2016: 409
- Second area, 2021: 456
- First area, 2011: 40 yrs
- First area, 2016: 44 yrs
- First area, 2021: 34 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 62 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 36 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Silverdale - Warragamba: 0.2% males, 0.4% females; 85+ in Luddenham: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Silverdale - Warragamba: 0.5% males, 0.5% females; 80–84 in Luddenham: 0.9% males, 1.3% females
- 75–79 in Silverdale - Warragamba: 0.9% males, 0.8% females; 75–79 in Luddenham: 2.6% males, 3.1% females
- 70–74 in Silverdale - Warragamba: 1.4% males, 1.6% females; 70–74 in Luddenham: 2.0% males, 2.2% females
- 65–69 in Silverdale - Warragamba: 2.1% males, 1.8% females; 65–69 in Luddenham: 2.0% males, 2.4% females
- 60–64 in Silverdale - Warragamba: 3.0% males, 2.7% females; 60–64 in Luddenham: 2.9% males, 3.1% females
- 55–59 in Silverdale - Warragamba: 3.1% males, 3.3% females; 55–59 in Luddenham: 3.1% males, 3.3% females
- 50–54 in Silverdale - Warragamba: 3.3% males, 3.6% females; 50–54 in Luddenham: 2.6% males, 3.3% females
- 45–49 in Silverdale - Warragamba: 3.7% males, 3.3% females; 45–49 in Luddenham: 2.6% males, 2.6% females
- 40–44 in Silverdale - Warragamba: 3.2% males, 3.5% females; 40–44 in Luddenham: 3.5% males, 2.6% females
- 35–39 in Silverdale - Warragamba: 3.4% males, 2.9% females; 35–39 in Luddenham: 3.3% males, 4.0% females
- 30–34 in Silverdale - Warragamba: 3.7% males, 4.0% females; 30–34 in Luddenham: 2.2% males, 2.6% females
- 25–29 in Silverdale - Warragamba: 3.5% males, 3.4% females; 25–29 in Luddenham: 3.3% males, 2.4% females
- 20–24 in Silverdale - Warragamba: 3.6% males, 2.8% females; 20–24 in Luddenham: 2.6% males, 3.7% females
- 15–19 in Silverdale - Warragamba: 3.7% males, 3.2% females; 15–19 in Luddenham: 3.5% males, 1.8% females
- 10–14 in Silverdale - Warragamba: 3.9% males, 3.5% females; 10–14 in Luddenham: 2.6% males, 5.1% females
- 5–9 in Silverdale - Warragamba: 3.7% males, 3.4% females; 5–9 in Luddenham: 4.8% males, 2.9% females
- 0–4 in Silverdale - Warragamba: 4.3% males, 3.9% females; 0–4 in Luddenham: 4.8% males, 4.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $404
- First area, 2016: $543
- First area, 2021: $996
- Second area, 2011: $646
- Second area, 2016: $440
- Second area, 2021: $921
- First area, 2011: $752
- First area, 2016: $1,186
- First area, 2021: $2,341
- Second area, 2011: $1,916
- Second area, 2016: $789
- Second area, 2021: $2,139
- First area, 2011: $908
- First area, 2016: $1,365
- First area, 2021: $2,524
- Second area, 2011: $1,777
- Second area, 2016: $992
- Second area, 2021: $2,319
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.4
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 3.1
- Second area, 2011: 2.9
- Second area, 2016: 1.9
- Second area, 2021: 3.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $340
- First area, 2021: $408
- Second area, 2016: $320
- Second area, 2021: $520
- First area, 2011: $1,517
- First area, 2016: $1,600
- First area, 2021: $2,383
- Second area, 2011: $1,950
- Second area, 2016: $1,517
- Second area, 2021: $2,243
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.60
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Silverdale - Warragamba with nearby areas
Compare Luddenham with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Silverdale - Warragamba vs Luddenham [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL114029/silverdale-warragamba/vs/UCL122080/luddenham