Compare
Parkes vs Tullamore
Urban Centre comparison ≈ 80 km apart · Parkes profile · Tullamore profile
Parkes Tullamore
Parkes and Tullamore (L) are two New South Wales areas with very different scales and economies. Parkes is a much larger hub where the typical weekly household income is $1,342, far higher than the $739 found in Tullamore (L). Renting is far more common in Parkes, where 31.9% of homes are rented, while Tullamore (L) has a far higher share of homes owned outright at 60.6%. Parkes is also more transient and active, with a far higher share of people who moved in the last five years (37.9% compared to 22.6%) and a far higher proportion of adults working or looking for work (57.3% versus 41.1%).
Both areas share a similar family makeup, with about 20% of their populations being children under 15. While Parkes has far better access to public transport, Tullamore (L) is more walkable, with almost every home within 15 minutes of groceries and health services. The gap in typical incomes has widened since 2011, and Tullamore (L) has seen its share of outright home ownership grow far beyond that of Parkes over the same period.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 5,101
- First area, 2016: 5,903
- First area, 2021: 9,832
- Second area, 2011: 246
- Second area, 2016: 389
- Second area, 2021: 218
- First area, 2011: 51 yrs
- First area, 2016: 38 yrs
- First area, 2021: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 46 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 41 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Parkes: 1.1% males, 2.1% females; 85+ in Tullamore: 1.5% males, 4.9% females
- 80–84 in Parkes: 1.3% males, 1.9% females; 80–84 in Tullamore: 0.0% males, 4.9% females
- 75–79 in Parkes: 1.8% males, 2.2% females; 75–79 in Tullamore: 3.4% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Parkes: 2.4% males, 2.4% females; 70–74 in Tullamore: 5.9% males, 2.0% females
- 65–69 in Parkes: 2.6% males, 2.9% females; 65–69 in Tullamore: 2.0% males, 2.5% females
- 60–64 in Parkes: 3.0% males, 3.1% females; 60–64 in Tullamore: 3.0% males, 4.4% females
- 55–59 in Parkes: 3.0% males, 3.1% females; 55–59 in Tullamore: 3.4% males, 2.0% females
- 50–54 in Parkes: 2.8% males, 3.0% females; 50–54 in Tullamore: 1.5% males, 2.5% females
- 45–49 in Parkes: 2.5% males, 2.7% females; 45–49 in Tullamore: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 40–44 in Parkes: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 40–44 in Tullamore: 2.5% males, 2.0% females
- 35–39 in Parkes: 2.6% males, 3.2% females; 35–39 in Tullamore: 3.0% males, 3.0% females
- 30–34 in Parkes: 3.2% males, 2.8% females; 30–34 in Tullamore: 3.0% males, 6.9% females
- 25–29 in Parkes: 3.4% males, 3.1% females; 25–29 in Tullamore: 3.9% males, 3.0% females
- 20–24 in Parkes: 3.0% males, 3.2% females; 20–24 in Tullamore: 0.0% males, 1.5% females
- 15–19 in Parkes: 3.0% males, 2.8% females; 15–19 in Tullamore: 2.0% males, 2.0% females
- 10–14 in Parkes: 3.6% males, 3.6% females; 10–14 in Tullamore: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 5–9 in Parkes: 3.5% males, 3.3% females; 5–9 in Tullamore: 1.5% males, 6.4% females
- 0–4 in Parkes: 3.4% males, 3.1% females; 0–4 in Tullamore: 3.9% males, 4.9% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $475
- First area, 2016: $629
- First area, 2021: $716
- Second area, 2011: $656
- Second area, 2016: $959
- Second area, 2021: $507
- First area, 2011: $872
- First area, 2016: $1,209
- First area, 2021: $1,342
- Second area, 2011: $1,375
- Second area, 2016: $1,420
- Second area, 2021: $739
- First area, 2011: $1,089
- First area, 2016: $1,521
- First area, 2021: $1,792
- Second area, 2011: $1,583
- Second area, 2016: $2,091
- Second area, 2021: $1,333
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.2
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.4
- Second area, 2011: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 1.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $230
- First area, 2021: $260
- Second area, 2016: $245
- Second area, 2021: $100
- First area, 2011: $1,950
- First area, 2016: $1,452
- First area, 2021: $1,300
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $275
- Second area, 2021: $433
- First area, 2011: 1.00
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.00
- Second area, 2016: 1.00
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Parkes with nearby areas
Compare Tullamore with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Parkes vs Tullamore [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/ucl/UCL114024/parkes/vs/UCL122140/tullamore