Compare
Karama vs Nightcliff
State Electorate comparison ≈ 7.4 km apart · Karama profile · Nightcliff profile
Karama Nightcliff
Nightcliff and Karama are neighbouring areas in Darwin with distinct housing and social profiles. Nightcliff is more likely to have renters (56.0%) and people living in flats or apartments (52.6%), while Karama is dominated by separate houses (73.4%) and larger family homes with three or more bedrooms (72.9%). Nightcliff has a significantly more qualified workforce, with 44.2% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher compared to 18.0% in Karama. This aligns with the typical weekly personal income, which is $1,151 in Nightcliff and $829 in Karama.
The two areas share a typical resident age of 35. They are also very similar in the proportion of people using another language at home, which is around 31%. However, the gaps between them are often widening; for example, the difference in university qualifications and typical incomes has grown since 2011. While Nightcliff is more walkable for groceries and food, Karama has far more walkable health services and public transport stops per 1,000 people.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 8,173
- First area, 2016: 9,777
- First area, 2021: 8,459
- Second area, 2011: 7,969
- Second area, 2016: 10,200
- Second area, 2021: 8,747
- First area, 2011: 32 yrs
- First area, 2016: 33 yrs
- First area, 2021: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 35 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Karama: 0.3% males, 0.3% females; 85+ in Nightcliff: 0.3% males, 0.4% females
- 80–84 in Karama: 0.4% males, 0.6% females; 80–84 in Nightcliff: 0.5% males, 0.6% females
- 75–79 in Karama: 0.8% males, 0.9% females; 75–79 in Nightcliff: 0.8% males, 0.9% females
- 70–74 in Karama: 1.6% males, 1.3% females; 70–74 in Nightcliff: 1.9% males, 1.7% females
- 65–69 in Karama: 2.4% males, 2.4% females; 65–69 in Nightcliff: 2.1% males, 2.1% females
- 60–64 in Karama: 3.0% males, 3.1% females; 60–64 in Nightcliff: 2.5% males, 2.5% females
- 55–59 in Karama: 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 55–59 in Nightcliff: 2.8% males, 2.7% females
- 50–54 in Karama: 2.9% males, 3.1% females; 50–54 in Nightcliff: 2.9% males, 3.0% females
- 45–49 in Karama: 3.3% males, 3.7% females; 45–49 in Nightcliff: 3.0% males, 3.2% females
- 40–44 in Karama: 3.0% males, 4.0% females; 40–44 in Nightcliff: 3.6% males, 3.8% females
- 35–39 in Karama: 3.3% males, 3.8% females; 35–39 in Nightcliff: 4.4% males, 4.6% females
- 30–34 in Karama: 3.2% males, 3.7% females; 30–34 in Nightcliff: 5.6% males, 6.6% females
- 25–29 in Karama: 3.5% males, 3.2% females; 25–29 in Nightcliff: 5.2% males, 6.1% females
- 20–24 in Karama: 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 20–24 in Nightcliff: 2.6% males, 2.5% females
- 15–19 in Karama: 3.8% males, 3.7% females; 15–19 in Nightcliff: 2.2% males, 1.9% females
- 10–14 in Karama: 4.1% males, 3.8% females; 10–14 in Nightcliff: 2.7% males, 2.4% females
- 5–9 in Karama: 4.1% males, 3.7% females; 5–9 in Nightcliff: 2.6% males, 2.8% females
- 0–4 in Karama: 3.3% males, 3.7% females; 0–4 in Nightcliff: 3.6% males, 3.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $761
- First area, 2016: $920
- First area, 2021: $829
- Second area, 2011: $919
- Second area, 2016: $1,210
- Second area, 2021: $1,151
- First area, 2011: $1,628
- First area, 2016: $1,815
- First area, 2021: $1,746
- Second area, 2011: $1,692
- Second area, 2016: $2,323
- Second area, 2021: $2,049
- First area, 2011: $1,799
- First area, 2016: $2,074
- First area, 2021: $2,032
- Second area, 2011: $2,071
- Second area, 2016: $2,698
- Second area, 2021: $2,426
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.0
- First area, 2016: 2.8
- First area, 2021: 2.8
- Second area, 2011: 2.4
- Second area, 2016: 2.2
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $295
- First area, 2016: $249
- First area, 2021: $300
- Second area, 2011: $350
- Second area, 2016: $500
- Second area, 2021: $350
- First area, 2011: $2,000
- First area, 2016: $1,733
- First area, 2021: $1,950
- Second area, 2011: $2,000
- Second area, 2016: $2,167
- Second area, 2021: $1,898
- First area, 2011: 1.20
- First area, 2016: 1.00
- First area, 2021: 1.00
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 1.00
- Second area, 2021: 1.00
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Karama with nearby areas
Compare Nightcliff with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Karama vs Nightcliff [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sed/SED70016/karama/vs/SED70021/nightcliff