Compare
Drysdale vs Mulka
State Electorate comparison ≈ 566 km apart · Drysdale profile · Mulka profile
Drysdale Mulka
Mulka and Drysdale are two very different Northern Territory areas located over 500km apart. Mulka has a much larger Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population (62.7%) and far more people using another language at home (63.1%). It is also characterized by larger households, with 4.0 people per home, and a lower typical weekly family income of $1,241. In contrast, Drysdale is more urban, with a higher typical family income of $2,035 and a much larger share of people born overseas (19.7%).
Both areas have very similar school enrolments, with Mulka at 2,134 and Drysdale at 2,170. While they share this scale, their infrastructure differs; Drysdale has far more public transport and higher walkability, whereas Mulka has more separate houses. Several gaps have narrowed since 2011, including the difference in typical family incomes and the proportion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander residents.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 8,335
- First area, 2016: 8,636
- First area, 2021: 8,590
- Second area, 2011: 8,342
- Second area, 2016: 12,140
- Second area, 2021: 9,478
- First area, 2011: 29 yrs
- First area, 2016: 32 yrs
- First area, 2021: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 27 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 29 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Drysdale: 0.2% males, 0.2% females; 85+ in Mulka: 0.0% males, 0.1% females
- 80–84 in Drysdale: 0.3% males, 0.4% females; 80–84 in Mulka: 0.1% males, 0.2% females
- 75–79 in Drysdale: 0.6% males, 0.6% females; 75–79 in Mulka: 0.3% males, 0.3% females
- 70–74 in Drysdale: 1.3% males, 1.5% females; 70–74 in Mulka: 0.6% males, 0.5% females
- 65–69 in Drysdale: 2.2% males, 1.6% females; 65–69 in Mulka: 1.0% males, 1.1% females
- 60–64 in Drysdale: 2.4% males, 2.4% females; 60–64 in Mulka: 1.8% males, 1.8% females
- 55–59 in Drysdale: 3.2% males, 2.7% females; 55–59 in Mulka: 2.5% males, 2.2% females
- 50–54 in Drysdale: 3.6% males, 2.9% females; 50–54 in Mulka: 2.9% males, 2.8% females
- 45–49 in Drysdale: 3.3% males, 3.4% females; 45–49 in Mulka: 3.0% males, 3.4% females
- 40–44 in Drysdale: 3.3% males, 3.8% females; 40–44 in Mulka: 4.0% males, 3.7% females
- 35–39 in Drysdale: 3.7% males, 4.0% females; 35–39 in Mulka: 4.2% males, 4.5% females
- 30–34 in Drysdale: 3.9% males, 4.5% females; 30–34 in Mulka: 3.9% males, 4.9% females
- 25–29 in Drysdale: 3.9% males, 4.0% females; 25–29 in Mulka: 4.0% males, 4.0% females
- 20–24 in Drysdale: 3.3% males, 3.2% females; 20–24 in Mulka: 4.0% males, 4.2% females
- 15–19 in Drysdale: 3.2% males, 3.0% females; 15–19 in Mulka: 4.7% males, 4.2% females
- 10–14 in Drysdale: 3.9% males, 3.6% females; 10–14 in Mulka: 4.7% males, 4.5% females
- 5–9 in Drysdale: 4.4% males, 4.1% females; 5–9 in Mulka: 4.5% males, 4.2% females
- 0–4 in Drysdale: 3.9% males, 3.7% females; 0–4 in Mulka: 4.0% males, 3.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $938
- First area, 2016: $872
- First area, 2021: $934
- Second area, 2011: $270
- Second area, 2016: $1,182
- Second area, 2021: $366
- First area, 2011: $1,898
- First area, 2016: $1,672
- First area, 2021: $1,670
- Second area, 2011: $995
- Second area, 2016: $2,337
- Second area, 2021: $2,069
- First area, 2011: $2,074
- First area, 2016: $1,955
- First area, 2021: $2,035
- Second area, 2011: $597
- Second area, 2016: $2,480
- Second area, 2021: $1,241
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.9
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 3.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.9
- Second area, 2021: 4.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $350
- First area, 2016: $350
- First area, 2021: $300
- Second area, 2011: $30
- Second area, 2016: $400
- Second area, 2021: $100
- First area, 2011: $2,167
- First area, 2016: $2,000
- First area, 2021: $1,733
- Second area, 2011: $1,246
- Second area, 2016: $2,600
- Second area, 2021: $1,741
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 1.00
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.70
- Second area, 2016: 1.10
- Second area, 2021: 1.40
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Drysdale with nearby areas
Compare Mulka with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Drysdale vs Mulka [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sed/SED70010/drysdale/vs/SED70018/mulka