Compare
Bulimba vs Clayfield
State Electorate comparison ≈ 7.0 km apart · Bulimba profile · Clayfield profile
Bulimba Clayfield
Clayfield and Bulimba are neighbouring areas with similar population sizes, but they offer different living patterns. Clayfield has a far higher share of renters at 47.5% and people living alone at 34.5%. It is also a hub for transport, with far more public transport routes and departures. In contrast, Bulimba has far more separate houses (57.6%) and homes with three or more bedrooms (70.5%). Bulimba also has a higher share of children under 15 at 18.5%, which helps explain why more people there are unpaid carers for children.
Both areas are almost identical in several ways, including a typical resident age of 36 and very similar levels of school advantage. While they share these common traits, the gap between them has shifted over time. Since 2011, the lead has flipped across many measures; for example, Bulimba now has a higher share of high-income households and a higher typical weekly income than Clayfield, reversing the previous trend.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 46,352
- First area, 2016: 51,599
- First area, 2021: 57,671
- Second area, 2011: 46,453
- Second area, 2016: 47,361
- Second area, 2021: 58,142
- First area, 2011: 44 yrs
- First area, 2016: 46 yrs
- First area, 2021: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 36 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 36 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Bulimba: 0.5% males, 1.1% females; 85+ in Clayfield: 0.6% males, 1.1% females
- 80–84 in Bulimba: 0.6% males, 0.7% females; 80–84 in Clayfield: 0.7% males, 0.9% females
- 75–79 in Bulimba: 0.8% males, 1.0% females; 75–79 in Clayfield: 1.1% males, 1.3% females
- 70–74 in Bulimba: 1.4% males, 1.5% females; 70–74 in Clayfield: 1.6% males, 1.7% females
- 65–69 in Bulimba: 1.7% males, 1.9% females; 65–69 in Clayfield: 1.9% males, 2.0% females
- 60–64 in Bulimba: 2.2% males, 2.4% females; 60–64 in Clayfield: 2.5% males, 2.5% females
- 55–59 in Bulimba: 2.8% males, 2.9% females; 55–59 in Clayfield: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
- 50–54 in Bulimba: 3.3% males, 3.6% females; 50–54 in Clayfield: 3.3% males, 3.5% females
- 45–49 in Bulimba: 3.7% males, 3.8% females; 45–49 in Clayfield: 3.4% males, 3.5% females
- 40–44 in Bulimba: 3.8% males, 4.0% females; 40–44 in Clayfield: 3.4% males, 3.4% females
- 35–39 in Bulimba: 4.4% males, 4.7% females; 35–39 in Clayfield: 4.3% males, 4.1% females
- 30–34 in Bulimba: 4.2% males, 4.5% females; 30–34 in Clayfield: 4.8% males, 4.8% females
- 25–29 in Bulimba: 3.8% males, 4.1% females; 25–29 in Clayfield: 5.1% males, 5.2% females
- 20–24 in Bulimba: 3.3% males, 3.6% females; 20–24 in Clayfield: 3.8% males, 4.6% females
- 15–19 in Bulimba: 2.8% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Clayfield: 2.3% males, 2.7% females
- 10–14 in Bulimba: 3.2% males, 3.0% females; 10–14 in Clayfield: 2.4% males, 2.5% females
- 5–9 in Bulimba: 3.3% males, 3.0% females; 5–9 in Clayfield: 2.4% males, 2.4% females
- 0–4 in Bulimba: 3.1% males, 2.9% females; 0–4 in Clayfield: 2.4% males, 2.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $526
- First area, 2016: $605
- First area, 2021: $1,202
- Second area, 2011: $634
- Second area, 2016: $711
- Second area, 2021: $1,151
- First area, 2011: $927
- First area, 2016: $1,124
- First area, 2021: $2,443
- Second area, 2011: $1,413
- Second area, 2016: $1,561
- Second area, 2021: $2,119
- First area, 2011: $1,171
- First area, 2016: $1,417
- First area, 2021: $3,084
- Second area, 2011: $1,594
- Second area, 2016: $1,795
- Second area, 2021: $2,936
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.2
- First area, 2016: 2.2
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 2.8
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.2
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $320
- First area, 2016: $355
- First area, 2021: $450
- Second area, 2011: $340
- Second area, 2016: $370
- Second area, 2021: $395
- First area, 2011: $1,950
- First area, 2016: $1,733
- First area, 2021: $2,350
- Second area, 2011: $1,933
- Second area, 2016: $1,863
- Second area, 2021: $2,200
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Bulimba with nearby areas
Compare Clayfield with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Bulimba vs Clayfield [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sed/SED30008/bulimba/vs/SED30019/clayfield