Compare
Caulfield (Southern Metropolitan) vs Sandringham (Southern Metropolitan)
State Electorate comparison ≈ 9.4 km apart · Caulfield (Southern Metropolitan) profile · Sandringham (Southern Metropolitan) profile
Caulfield (Southern Metropolitan) Sandringham (Southern Metropolitan)
Caulfield (Southern Metropolitan) and Sandringham (Southern Metropolitan) are neighbouring areas with distinct housing and demographic profiles. Caulfield (Southern Metropolitan) is younger, with a typical resident aged 37, and has a far higher share of renters (39.0%) and people using another language at home (26.0%). In contrast, Sandringham (Southern Metropolitan) is noticeably older, with a typical age of 44, and has a much higher share of separate houses (54.5%) and homes with three or more bedrooms (64.7%).
The gap in religious views has widened since 2016, with no religion now far more common in Sandringham (Southern Metropolitan) at 46.8% compared to 35.7% in Caulfield (Southern Metropolitan). Despite this shift, the two areas share many similarities, including almost identical proportions of children under 15 (around 16%) and very similar typical household incomes, both sitting just above the national figure. While Caulfield (Southern Metropolitan) has more people born overseas and more recent arrivals, the gap in these measures has narrowed over time.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 59,430
- First area, 2016: 65,552
- First area, 2021: 67,787
- Second area, 2016: 58,593
- Second area, 2021: 63,903
- First area, 2011: 37 yrs
- First area, 2016: 35 yrs
- First area, 2021: 37 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 43 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 44 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Caulfield (Southern Metropolitan): 0.9% males, 1.7% females; 85+ in Sandringham (Southern Metropolitan): 1.1% males, 1.9% females
- 80–84 in Caulfield (Southern Metropolitan): 0.8% males, 1.1% females; 80–84 in Sandringham (Southern Metropolitan): 1.1% males, 1.4% females
- 75–79 in Caulfield (Southern Metropolitan): 1.3% males, 1.5% females; 75–79 in Sandringham (Southern Metropolitan): 1.8% males, 2.2% females
- 70–74 in Caulfield (Southern Metropolitan): 2.2% males, 2.5% females; 70–74 in Sandringham (Southern Metropolitan): 2.4% males, 2.8% females
- 65–69 in Caulfield (Southern Metropolitan): 2.3% males, 2.5% females; 65–69 in Sandringham (Southern Metropolitan): 2.6% males, 3.0% females
- 60–64 in Caulfield (Southern Metropolitan): 2.3% males, 2.6% females; 60–64 in Sandringham (Southern Metropolitan): 3.1% males, 3.3% females
- 55–59 in Caulfield (Southern Metropolitan): 2.5% males, 2.7% females; 55–59 in Sandringham (Southern Metropolitan): 3.3% males, 3.7% females
- 50–54 in Caulfield (Southern Metropolitan): 2.8% males, 3.2% females; 50–54 in Sandringham (Southern Metropolitan): 3.9% males, 4.2% females
- 45–49 in Caulfield (Southern Metropolitan): 3.0% males, 3.2% females; 45–49 in Sandringham (Southern Metropolitan): 3.6% males, 4.1% females
- 40–44 in Caulfield (Southern Metropolitan): 3.2% males, 3.4% females; 40–44 in Sandringham (Southern Metropolitan): 3.1% males, 3.6% females
- 35–39 in Caulfield (Southern Metropolitan): 4.0% males, 4.0% females; 35–39 in Sandringham (Southern Metropolitan): 2.8% males, 3.1% females
- 30–34 in Caulfield (Southern Metropolitan): 4.4% males, 4.5% females; 30–34 in Sandringham (Southern Metropolitan): 2.5% males, 2.9% females
- 25–29 in Caulfield (Southern Metropolitan): 4.5% males, 4.7% females; 25–29 in Sandringham (Southern Metropolitan): 2.2% males, 2.3% females
- 20–24 in Caulfield (Southern Metropolitan): 3.3% males, 3.4% females; 20–24 in Sandringham (Southern Metropolitan): 2.6% males, 2.4% females
- 15–19 in Caulfield (Southern Metropolitan): 2.4% males, 2.5% females; 15–19 in Sandringham (Southern Metropolitan): 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 10–14 in Caulfield (Southern Metropolitan): 2.8% males, 2.7% females; 10–14 in Sandringham (Southern Metropolitan): 3.2% males, 3.3% females
- 5–9 in Caulfield (Southern Metropolitan): 2.7% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Sandringham (Southern Metropolitan): 2.8% males, 2.9% females
- 0–4 in Caulfield (Southern Metropolitan): 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 0–4 in Sandringham (Southern Metropolitan): 2.3% males, 2.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $581
- First area, 2016: $878
- First area, 2021: $1,114
- Second area, 2016: $856
- Second area, 2021: $1,053
- First area, 2011: $1,481
- First area, 2016: $1,805
- First area, 2021: $2,135
- Second area, 2016: $1,868
- Second area, 2021: $2,220
- First area, 2011: $2,010
- First area, 2016: $2,391
- First area, 2021: $2,956
- Second area, 2016: $2,464
- Second area, 2021: $3,043
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.4
- First area, 2021: 2.3
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $335
- First area, 2016: $385
- First area, 2021: $420
- Second area, 2016: $390
- Second area, 2021: $440
- First area, 2011: $2,167
- First area, 2016: $2,167
- First area, 2021: $2,389
- Second area, 2016: $2,200
- Second area, 2021: $2,500
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 1.00
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Caulfield (Southern Metropolitan) with nearby areas
Compare Sandringham (Southern Metropolitan) with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Caulfield (Southern Metropolitan) vs Sandringham (Southern Metropolitan) [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sed/SED21906/caulfield/vs/SED27406/sandringham