Compare
Box Hill (Eastern Metropolitan) vs Oakleigh (Southern Metropolitan)
State Electorate comparison ≈ 9.7 km apart · Box Hill (Eastern Metropolitan) profile · Oakleigh (Southern Metropolitan) profile
Box Hill (Eastern Metropolitan) Oakleigh (Southern Metropolitan)
Box Hill (Eastern Metropolitan) and Oakleigh (Southern Metropolitan) are both large, diverse residential hubs in Melbourne. Box Hill (Eastern Metropolitan) has a noticeably older population, with a typical resident aged 39 and a higher share of people aged 65 and over (18.2%). It also has a much higher number of school enrolments (11,258) and more schools per 1,000 children than Oakleigh (Southern Metropolitan). In contrast, Oakleigh (Southern Metropolitan) is younger, with a typical age of 35, and has a higher proportion of renters (39.5%) and recent overseas arrivals (25.3%).
Everyday life in both areas is very similar, with almost identical typical household incomes and nearly the same percentage of adults holding a bachelor degree (about 44%). Both areas are far above the national figure for people using another language at home, though this gap between the two has narrowed since 2016. Other differences, such as the gap in homes owned outright or the share of people who have moved in the last five years, have also shrunk over time.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 69,349
- First area, 2021: 73,444
- Second area, 2016: 71,764
- Second area, 2021: 73,129
- First area, 2016: 38 yrs
- First area, 2021: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 35 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Box Hill (Eastern Metropolitan): 1.3% males, 2.3% females; 85+ in Oakleigh (Southern Metropolitan): 1.0% males, 1.5% females
- 80–84 in Box Hill (Eastern Metropolitan): 1.1% males, 1.6% females; 80–84 in Oakleigh (Southern Metropolitan): 0.9% males, 1.2% females
- 75–79 in Box Hill (Eastern Metropolitan): 1.4% males, 1.7% females; 75–79 in Oakleigh (Southern Metropolitan): 1.1% males, 1.5% females
- 70–74 in Box Hill (Eastern Metropolitan): 1.9% males, 2.3% females; 70–74 in Oakleigh (Southern Metropolitan): 1.5% males, 1.8% females
- 65–69 in Box Hill (Eastern Metropolitan): 2.2% males, 2.5% females; 65–69 in Oakleigh (Southern Metropolitan): 1.7% males, 1.9% females
- 60–64 in Box Hill (Eastern Metropolitan): 2.6% males, 2.9% females; 60–64 in Oakleigh (Southern Metropolitan): 2.2% males, 2.3% females
- 55–59 in Box Hill (Eastern Metropolitan): 2.8% males, 3.1% females; 55–59 in Oakleigh (Southern Metropolitan): 2.5% males, 2.7% females
- 50–54 in Box Hill (Eastern Metropolitan): 3.2% males, 3.6% females; 50–54 in Oakleigh (Southern Metropolitan): 2.8% males, 3.0% females
- 45–49 in Box Hill (Eastern Metropolitan): 3.2% males, 3.6% females; 45–49 in Oakleigh (Southern Metropolitan): 3.0% males, 3.1% females
- 40–44 in Box Hill (Eastern Metropolitan): 3.0% males, 3.3% females; 40–44 in Oakleigh (Southern Metropolitan): 3.3% males, 3.1% females
- 35–39 in Box Hill (Eastern Metropolitan): 3.3% males, 3.5% females; 35–39 in Oakleigh (Southern Metropolitan): 4.0% males, 4.0% females
- 30–34 in Box Hill (Eastern Metropolitan): 3.4% males, 3.6% females; 30–34 in Oakleigh (Southern Metropolitan): 4.6% males, 4.7% females
- 25–29 in Box Hill (Eastern Metropolitan): 3.9% males, 3.7% females; 25–29 in Oakleigh (Southern Metropolitan): 5.9% males, 5.1% females
- 20–24 in Box Hill (Eastern Metropolitan): 4.1% males, 3.8% females; 20–24 in Oakleigh (Southern Metropolitan): 5.4% males, 5.0% females
- 15–19 in Box Hill (Eastern Metropolitan): 3.1% males, 3.0% females; 15–19 in Oakleigh (Southern Metropolitan): 2.5% males, 2.6% females
- 10–14 in Box Hill (Eastern Metropolitan): 3.0% males, 2.9% females; 10–14 in Oakleigh (Southern Metropolitan): 2.3% males, 2.2% females
- 5–9 in Box Hill (Eastern Metropolitan): 2.7% males, 2.5% females; 5–9 in Oakleigh (Southern Metropolitan): 2.6% males, 2.3% females
- 0–4 in Box Hill (Eastern Metropolitan): 2.1% males, 2.0% females; 0–4 in Oakleigh (Southern Metropolitan): 2.5% males, 2.3% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2016: $666
- First area, 2021: $814
- Second area, 2016: $600
- Second area, 2021: $858
- First area, 2016: $1,568
- First area, 2021: $1,836
- Second area, 2016: $1,461
- Second area, 2021: $1,873
- First area, 2016: $2,051
- First area, 2021: $2,369
- Second area, 2016: $1,933
- Second area, 2021: $2,408
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2016: 2.5
- Second area, 2021: 2.4
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: $380
- First area, 2021: $411
- Second area, 2016: $360
- Second area, 2021: $400
- First area, 2016: $2,000
- First area, 2021: $2,383
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $2,167
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2016: 1.00
- Second area, 2021: 0.90
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Box Hill (Eastern Metropolitan) with nearby areas
Compare Oakleigh (Southern Metropolitan) with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Box Hill (Eastern Metropolitan) vs Oakleigh (Southern Metropolitan) [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sed/SED21001/box-hill/vs/SED26406/oakleigh