Compare
Auburn vs Lakemba
State Electorate comparison ≈ 6.7 km apart · Auburn profile · Lakemba profile
Auburn Lakemba
Auburn and Lakemba are neighbouring areas with large populations and a high proportion of people born overseas. Auburn is more transient, with 46.9% of residents moving in the last five years, and is more likely to have flats or apartments (51.7%). Lakemba has a higher share of separate houses (48.6%) and is more family-oriented, with a higher share of children under 15 (21.9%). Auburn has a more highly qualified workforce, with 30.8% of adults holding a bachelor degree or higher, and a typical weekly household income that is well higher at $1,729 compared to $1,332 in Lakemba.
Both areas sit near the national figure for typical household income, though Auburn is much closer to it than Lakemba. They share several common traits, including very similar numbers of people living alone and almost identical access to public transport, with 99.9% of homes within a 10-minute walk of a stop. Since 2011, the gap in typical incomes and education levels has narrowed as Auburn's lead has decreased.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 92,029
- First area, 2016: 103,686
- First area, 2021: 117,822
- Second area, 2011: 68,633
- Second area, 2016: 91,623
- Second area, 2021: 96,008
- First area, 2011: 32 yrs
- First area, 2016: 32 yrs
- First area, 2021: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 39 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 33 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 34 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Auburn: 0.5% males, 0.6% females; 85+ in Lakemba: 0.8% males, 1.1% females
- 80–84 in Auburn: 0.5% males, 0.6% females; 80–84 in Lakemba: 0.9% males, 1.0% females
- 75–79 in Auburn: 0.9% males, 0.8% females; 75–79 in Lakemba: 1.2% males, 1.2% females
- 70–74 in Auburn: 1.3% males, 1.2% females; 70–74 in Lakemba: 1.7% males, 1.6% females
- 65–69 in Auburn: 1.8% males, 1.9% females; 65–69 in Lakemba: 2.1% males, 2.1% females
- 60–64 in Auburn: 2.3% males, 2.3% females; 60–64 in Lakemba: 2.5% males, 2.6% females
- 55–59 in Auburn: 2.6% males, 2.5% females; 55–59 in Lakemba: 2.8% males, 2.7% females
- 50–54 in Auburn: 2.7% males, 2.6% females; 50–54 in Lakemba: 2.7% males, 2.8% females
- 45–49 in Auburn: 2.9% males, 2.5% females; 45–49 in Lakemba: 2.8% males, 2.8% females
- 40–44 in Auburn: 3.5% males, 2.9% females; 40–44 in Lakemba: 3.4% males, 3.2% females
- 35–39 in Auburn: 5.0% males, 4.1% females; 35–39 in Lakemba: 3.8% males, 3.5% females
- 30–34 in Auburn: 6.4% males, 5.4% females; 30–34 in Lakemba: 3.9% males, 3.6% females
- 25–29 in Auburn: 6.3% males, 5.4% females; 25–29 in Lakemba: 4.5% males, 3.8% females
- 20–24 in Auburn: 4.9% males, 4.1% females; 20–24 in Lakemba: 3.7% males, 3.2% females
- 15–19 in Auburn: 2.3% males, 2.2% females; 15–19 in Lakemba: 3.2% males, 3.1% females
- 10–14 in Auburn: 2.5% males, 2.4% females; 10–14 in Lakemba: 3.7% males, 3.3% females
- 5–9 in Auburn: 2.9% males, 2.8% females; 5–9 in Lakemba: 3.8% males, 3.7% females
- 0–4 in Auburn: 3.4% males, 3.1% females; 0–4 in Lakemba: 3.8% males, 3.5% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $412
- First area, 2016: $494
- First area, 2021: $688
- Second area, 2011: $847
- Second area, 2016: $439
- Second area, 2021: $524
- First area, 2011: $1,127
- First area, 2016: $1,407
- First area, 2021: $1,729
- Second area, 2011: $1,979
- Second area, 2016: $1,107
- Second area, 2021: $1,332
- First area, 2011: $1,153
- First area, 2016: $1,374
- First area, 2021: $1,764
- Second area, 2011: $2,535
- Second area, 2016: $1,220
- Second area, 2021: $1,471
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 3.1
- First area, 2016: 3.2
- First area, 2021: 2.9
- Second area, 2011: 2.6
- Second area, 2016: 3.2
- Second area, 2021: 3.1
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $350
- First area, 2016: $435
- First area, 2021: $460
- Second area, 2011: $420
- Second area, 2016: $350
- Second area, 2021: $360
- First area, 2011: $2,000
- First area, 2016: $2,000
- First area, 2021: $2,167
- Second area, 2011: $2,800
- Second area, 2016: $1,950
- Second area, 2021: $2,106
- First area, 2011: 1.30
- First area, 2016: 1.20
- First area, 2021: 1.20
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 1.20
- Second area, 2021: 1.10
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Auburn with nearby areas
Compare Lakemba with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Auburn vs Lakemba [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sed/SED10002/auburn/vs/SED10043/lakemba