Compare
O'Connor vs Turner
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 1.6 km apart · O'Connor profile · Turner profile
O'Connor Turner
O'Connor (ACT) and Turner are neighbouring areas with very different housing and family profiles. O'Connor (ACT) is more house-based, with 66.0% of homes being separate houses and 68.4% having three or more bedrooms. It also has a larger presence of families, with 15.4% of people being children under 15 and 24.9% of people caring for children unpaid. In contrast, Turner is dominated by apartments, with 73.2% of homes being flats or apartments and 54.3% of households renting. Turner is also more likely to be home to people living alone (38.5%) and young adults, with a typical resident aged 31 compared to 35 in O'Connor (ACT).
Both areas have tracked in the same direction since 2011, as crime rates have fallen in both places. They share several characteristics, including a similar share of First Nations people (around 1.3% to 1.4%) and nearly identical access to parks and public transport. This high level of walkability is consistent across both areas, with 100% of homes in Turner and nearly 90% in O'Connor (ACT) within a 15-minute walk of groceries and health services.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 5,251
- First area, 2016: 5,481
- First area, 2021: 5,917
- Second area, 2011: 3,595
- Second area, 2016: 4,047
- Second area, 2021: 4,470
- First area, 2011: 35 yrs
- First area, 2016: 34 yrs
- First area, 2021: 35 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 30 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 31 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 31 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in O'Connor: 0.5% males, 0.9% females; 85+ in Turner: 0.4% males, 0.5% females
- 80–84 in O'Connor: 0.5% males, 0.7% females; 80–84 in Turner: 0.4% males, 0.7% females
- 75–79 in O'Connor: 1.0% males, 1.2% females; 75–79 in Turner: 0.8% males, 1.1% females
- 70–74 in O'Connor: 1.7% males, 2.0% females; 70–74 in Turner: 1.0% males, 1.8% females
- 65–69 in O'Connor: 2.4% males, 2.1% females; 65–69 in Turner: 1.7% males, 1.5% females
- 60–64 in O'Connor: 2.7% males, 2.8% females; 60–64 in Turner: 2.0% males, 1.7% females
- 55–59 in O'Connor: 2.8% males, 3.0% females; 55–59 in Turner: 1.9% males, 2.0% females
- 50–54 in O'Connor: 3.5% males, 3.9% females; 50–54 in Turner: 2.3% males, 2.5% females
- 45–49 in O'Connor: 3.6% males, 3.6% females; 45–49 in Turner: 2.1% males, 2.3% females
- 40–44 in O'Connor: 2.9% males, 3.2% females; 40–44 in Turner: 2.9% males, 2.9% females
- 35–39 in O'Connor: 2.6% males, 3.1% females; 35–39 in Turner: 4.6% males, 4.1% females
- 30–34 in O'Connor: 3.3% males, 3.3% females; 30–34 in Turner: 6.3% males, 6.7% females
- 25–29 in O'Connor: 4.5% males, 4.6% females; 25–29 in Turner: 9.3% males, 9.4% females
- 20–24 in O'Connor: 5.7% males, 6.4% females; 20–24 in Turner: 6.6% males, 9.8% females
- 15–19 in O'Connor: 3.3% males, 2.6% females; 15–19 in Turner: 1.1% males, 1.6% females
- 10–14 in O'Connor: 3.4% males, 3.2% females; 10–14 in Turner: 1.4% males, 1.2% females
- 5–9 in O'Connor: 2.6% males, 2.6% females; 5–9 in Turner: 1.2% males, 1.4% females
- 0–4 in O'Connor: 2.1% males, 1.7% females; 0–4 in Turner: 1.4% males, 1.2% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $969
- First area, 2016: $1,026
- First area, 2021: $1,261
- Second area, 2011: $1,162
- Second area, 2016: $1,125
- Second area, 2021: $1,448
- First area, 2011: $1,982
- First area, 2016: $2,129
- First area, 2021: $2,518
- Second area, 2011: $1,954
- Second area, 2016: $1,924
- Second area, 2021: $2,330
- First area, 2011: $2,649
- First area, 2016: $2,861
- First area, 2021: $3,463
- Second area, 2011: $2,616
- Second area, 2016: $2,466
- Second area, 2021: $3,199
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.5
- First area, 2016: 2.5
- First area, 2021: 2.5
- Second area, 2011: 1.9
- Second area, 2016: 2.0
- Second area, 2021: 2.0
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $400
- First area, 2016: $380
- First area, 2021: $451
- Second area, 2011: $430
- Second area, 2016: $400
- Second area, 2021: $480
- First area, 2011: $2,422
- First area, 2016: $2,167
- First area, 2021: $2,500
- Second area, 2011: $2,297
- Second area, 2016: $2,015
- Second area, 2021: $1,901
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.90
- First area, 2021: 0.90
- Second area, 2011: 1.20
- Second area, 2016: 1.10
- Second area, 2021: 1.00
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare O'Connor with nearby areas
Compare Turner with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). O'Connor vs Turner [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL80102/o-connor/vs/SAL80127/turner