Compare
Latham vs Macgregor
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.1 km apart · Latham profile · Macgregor profile
Latham Macgregor
Macgregor and Latham are neighbouring areas in the ACT with very different layouts. Latham is very walkable, with 99.9% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries and a walkability score of 7.0. In contrast, Macgregor is only somewhat walkable (4.5), with just 18.7% of homes within a short walk of groceries. Macgregor has a younger feel, with 24.3% of its population under 15 and more people born overseas (26.4%). Latham has more older residents, with 16% aged 65 and over, and a higher share of homes owned outright at 31.9% compared to 20.7% in Macgregor.
Both areas sit close to the national figure for the share of people who provide unpaid care. This similarity is part of a broader pattern, as the two areas are also alike in their typical weekly incomes and the proportion of people who have no religion. While they share many common traits, the gap in walkability and access to amenities remains a major distinction between the two.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 3,602
- First area, 2016: 3,634
- First area, 2021: 3,767
- Second area, 2011: 5,506
- Second area, 2016: 6,796
- Second area, 2021: 7,049
- First area, 2011: 37 yrs
- First area, 2016: 36 yrs
- First area, 2021: 38 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 31 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 32 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 34 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Latham: 0.4% males, 0.4% females; 85+ in Macgregor: 0.2% males, 0.2% females
- 80–84 in Latham: 0.7% males, 0.8% females; 80–84 in Macgregor: 0.3% males, 0.5% females
- 75–79 in Latham: 1.5% males, 1.7% females; 75–79 in Macgregor: 0.9% males, 1.1% females
- 70–74 in Latham: 2.3% males, 3.3% females; 70–74 in Macgregor: 1.6% males, 1.9% females
- 65–69 in Latham: 2.0% males, 2.6% females; 65–69 in Macgregor: 1.7% males, 1.8% females
- 60–64 in Latham: 2.3% males, 2.9% females; 60–64 in Macgregor: 2.0% males, 2.3% females
- 55–59 in Latham: 2.3% males, 3.0% females; 55–59 in Macgregor: 1.7% males, 2.0% females
- 50–54 in Latham: 3.1% males, 2.7% females; 50–54 in Macgregor: 2.6% males, 2.5% females
- 45–49 in Latham: 3.8% males, 3.7% females; 45–49 in Macgregor: 3.3% males, 3.3% females
- 40–44 in Latham: 3.5% males, 3.8% females; 40–44 in Macgregor: 4.4% males, 4.8% females
- 35–39 in Latham: 3.9% males, 4.1% females; 35–39 in Macgregor: 5.3% males, 5.3% females
- 30–34 in Latham: 3.8% males, 4.2% females; 30–34 in Macgregor: 4.1% males, 4.5% females
- 25–29 in Latham: 2.8% males, 2.9% females; 25–29 in Macgregor: 3.5% males, 3.8% females
- 20–24 in Latham: 2.7% males, 2.3% females; 20–24 in Macgregor: 2.6% males, 2.5% females
- 15–19 in Latham: 2.8% males, 2.8% females; 15–19 in Macgregor: 2.3% males, 2.6% females
- 10–14 in Latham: 3.7% males, 2.3% females; 10–14 in Macgregor: 4.1% males, 3.5% females
- 5–9 in Latham: 4.1% males, 3.3% females; 5–9 in Macgregor: 4.3% males, 4.7% females
- 0–4 in Latham: 3.8% males, 3.5% females; 0–4 in Macgregor: 4.1% males, 3.6% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $860
- First area, 2016: $903
- First area, 2021: $1,089
- Second area, 2011: $935
- Second area, 2016: $1,043
- Second area, 2021: $1,172
- First area, 2011: $1,720
- First area, 2016: $1,859
- First area, 2021: $2,125
- Second area, 2011: $1,898
- Second area, 2016: $2,063
- Second area, 2021: $2,344
- First area, 2011: $1,956
- First area, 2016: $2,172
- First area, 2021: $2,495
- Second area, 2011: $2,072
- Second area, 2016: $2,249
- Second area, 2021: $2,625
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.6
- First area, 2016: 2.7
- First area, 2021: 2.6
- Second area, 2011: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.7
- Second area, 2021: 2.7
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $351
- First area, 2016: $370
- First area, 2021: $400
- Second area, 2011: $390
- Second area, 2016: $392
- Second area, 2021: $464
- First area, 2011: $2,000
- First area, 2016: $2,000
- First area, 2021: $2,000
- Second area, 2011: $2,167
- Second area, 2016: $2,000
- Second area, 2021: $2,000
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.80
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Crime & Safety
Walkability
Compare Latham with nearby areas
Compare Macgregor with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Latham vs Macgregor [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL80084/latham/vs/SAL80089/macgregor