Compare
Fyshwick vs Russell
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 2.6 km apart · Fyshwick profile · Russell profile
Fyshwick Russell
Fyshwick and Russell are both sparsely populated, non-residential areas in the Australian Capital Territory. Fyshwick is very walkable, with 99.3% of homes within a 15-minute walk of groceries and 99.8% near a range of amenities. In contrast, Russell has much higher street connectivity and a far larger number of people reachable by transit within 45 minutes, reaching 50,143 compared to just 6,631 in Fyshwick. However, Russell is much better for school access, with 100% of homes within a 15-minute walk of a school, while only 3.4% of homes in Fyshwick have that access.
Both areas are almost identical in that every home is within a 15-minute walk of a park. While Fyshwick has more public transport stops and a slightly higher walkability score, Russell is well higher for the share of homes within a 10-minute walk of public transport. This suggests that while Fyshwick has more infrastructure, Russell's small size makes its transport more accessible for residents.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 56
- First area, 2021: 52
- Second area, 2016: 0
- Second area, 2021: 0
- First area, 2016: 42 yrs
- First area, 2021: 37 yrs
Ancestry & Birthplace
Language
Religion
Education & Qualifications
Income
- First area, 2016: $2,249
- First area, 2021: $1,374
Health & Disability
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2016: 1.00
- First area, 2021: 1.00
Transport & Vehicles
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Walkability
Compare Fyshwick with nearby areas
Compare Russell with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Fyshwick vs Russell [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL80060/fyshwick/vs/SAL80116/russell