Compare
Glyde Point vs Shoal Bay
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 21 km apart · Glyde Point profile · Shoal Bay profile
Glyde Point Shoal Bay
Glyde Point and Shoal Bay (NT) are both sparsely populated and largely non-residential areas in the Northern Territory. There is very little difference between them in terms of infrastructure, though Glyde Point has a slightly higher mean terrain slope at 5.7% compared to 4.4% in Shoal Bay (NT).
Both areas are completely car-dependent, with no homes within a 15-minute walk of parks, schools, groceries, or health services. Since these areas have no residents and effectively no local amenities, the gaps between them in these categories have remained unchanged.
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 0
- First area, 2021: 0
- Second area, 2011: 18
- Second area, 2016: 16
- Second area, 2021: 0
- Second area, 2011: 60 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 22 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 23 yrs
Education & Qualifications
Income
- Second area, 2011: $287
- Second area, 2016: $1,025
- Second area, 2021: $1,375
- Second area, 2011: $841
- Second area, 2021: $1,375
First Nations
Family & Households
- Second area, 2011: 2.3
- Second area, 2021: 1.0
Housing & Dwellings
- Second area, 2011: 1.50
- Second area, 2021: 1.00
Transport & Vehicles
Walkability
Compare Glyde Point with nearby areas
Compare Shoal Bay with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Glyde Point vs Shoal Bay [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL70111/glyde-point/vs/SAL70240/shoal-bay