Compare
Charles Darwin vs Coonawarra
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 3.8 km apart · Charles Darwin profile · Coonawarra profile
Charles Darwin Coonawarra
Coonawarra (NT) and Charles Darwin are both sparsely populated areas in the Northern Territory. Coonawarra (NT) is slightly more connected, with far more public transport routes and stops, while Charles Darwin has none. This makes the transit time to the city far higher in Charles Darwin at 80 minutes, compared to 49 minutes in Coonawarra (NT). Access to nature also differs, with homes within a 15 minute walk of a park far higher in Coonawarra (NT) at 60.4% compared to 50.0% in Charles Darwin.
Both areas are equally car-dependent. They share a similar lack of nearby essentials, as no homes in either place are within a 15 minute walk of groceries, health services, or schools. While Coonawarra (NT) has a few more types of amenities within a short walk, the two neighbours are very alike in their general layout and distance from urban hubs.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 0
- First area, 2021: 0
- Second area, 2011: 827
- Second area, 2016: 78
- Second area, 2021: 20
- Second area, 2011: 26 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 27 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 24 yrs
Ancestry & Birthplace
Language
Religion
Education & Qualifications
Income
- Second area, 2011: $912
- Second area, 2016: $1,213
- Second area, 2021: $1,228
Health & Disability
Community Participation
First Nations
Transport & Vehicles
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Walkability
Compare Charles Darwin with nearby areas
Compare Coonawarra with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Charles Darwin vs Coonawarra [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL70053/charles-darwin/vs/SAL70064/coonawarra