Compare
Buffalo Creek vs Holmes
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 3.0 km apart · Buffalo Creek profile · Holmes profile
Buffalo Creek Holmes
Holmes and Buffalo Creek are both sparsely populated, non-residential areas in the Northern Territory. Holmes is far more connected, with 18 intersections per square kilometre compared to just 2 in Buffalo Creek. It is also more walkable; Holmes is mostly car-dependent with a score of 3.7, while Buffalo Creek is car-dependent with a score of 0.3. This is reflected in the access to local services, as 87.5% of Holmes homes are within a 15-minute walk of a park, whereas Buffalo Creek has no homes with that access.
Since 2011, these neighbouring areas have tracked similarly as largely uninhabited spaces. They share a similar physical landscape with a low mean terrain slope and roughly the same walk to the nearest transport stop. While both areas have very few residents, Holmes is better served by infrastructure, with 3 public transport routes and 23 schools within 3 km, compared to no routes and 10 schools for Buffalo Creek.
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2016: 0
- First area, 2021: 0
- Second area, 2011: 3
- Second area, 2016: 0
- Second area, 2021: 0
Education & Qualifications
First Nations
Transport & Vehicles
Walkability
Compare Buffalo Creek with nearby areas
Compare Holmes with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Buffalo Creek vs Holmes [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL70042/buffalo-creek/vs/SAL70126/holmes