Compare
Rosebery vs Waratah
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 40 km apart · Rosebery profile · Waratah profile
Rosebery Waratah
Rosebery (Tas.) and Waratah (Tas.) are two nearby Tasmanian towns with very different economic profiles. Rosebery (Tas.) has a more active workforce, with 43.0% of adults working or looking for work and far more people employed full-time (62.0%) than in Waratah (Tas.) (48.3%). This is consistent with a workforce more focused on mining and professional roles. Waratah (Tas.) has a noticeably older population, with a typical age of 55 and a much higher share of people aged 65 and over (26.9%). Health challenges are also more common here, with 52.6% of residents living with a long-term health condition compared to 37.9% in Rosebery (Tas.).
Both towns share a nearly identical housing style, with 91.7% of homes being separate houses. They also have the same rate of people who finished Year 12 (29.5%) and an identical lack of recent overseas arrivals. While they share these basic traits, their local services differ; Rosebery (Tas.) is far better served for health and education, with 58.1% of homes within a 15-minute walk of health services and 53.7% near a school, while Waratah (Tas.) has no such facilities within that walk.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 922
- First area, 2016: 708
- First area, 2021: 752
- Second area, 2011: 298
- Second area, 2016: 245
- Second area, 2021: 249
- First area, 2011: 34 yrs
- First area, 2016: 41 yrs
- First area, 2021: 48 yrs
- Second area, 2011: 45 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 53 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 55 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Rosebery: 0.0% males, 0.9% females; 85+ in Waratah: 1.3% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Rosebery: 1.2% males, 1.2% females; 80–84 in Waratah: 2.2% males, 1.8% females
- 75–79 in Rosebery: 2.3% males, 0.7% females; 75–79 in Waratah: 2.7% males, 1.8% females
- 70–74 in Rosebery: 3.2% males, 1.6% females; 70–74 in Waratah: 4.9% males, 3.1% females
- 65–69 in Rosebery: 4.8% males, 4.5% females; 65–69 in Waratah: 8.1% males, 4.0% females
- 60–64 in Rosebery: 6.0% males, 3.5% females; 60–64 in Waratah: 5.8% males, 3.6% females
- 55–59 in Rosebery: 4.8% males, 5.6% females; 55–59 in Waratah: 4.5% males, 8.1% females
- 50–54 in Rosebery: 4.3% males, 2.7% females; 50–54 in Waratah: 4.0% males, 5.8% females
- 45–49 in Rosebery: 4.5% males, 3.1% females; 45–49 in Waratah: 1.8% males, 4.0% females
- 40–44 in Rosebery: 1.9% males, 2.7% females; 40–44 in Waratah: 1.8% males, 1.3% females
- 35–39 in Rosebery: 3.3% males, 3.6% females; 35–39 in Waratah: 1.8% males, 1.8% females
- 30–34 in Rosebery: 2.3% males, 3.6% females; 30–34 in Waratah: 1.3% males, 2.2% females
- 25–29 in Rosebery: 2.8% males, 1.6% females; 25–29 in Waratah: 2.7% males, 1.3% females
- 20–24 in Rosebery: 2.5% males, 2.4% females; 20–24 in Waratah: 0.0% males, 1.8% females
- 15–19 in Rosebery: 1.9% males, 2.7% females; 15–19 in Waratah: 1.8% males, 4.5% females
- 10–14 in Rosebery: 3.1% males, 2.8% females; 10–14 in Waratah: 3.1% males, 3.1% females
- 5–9 in Rosebery: 2.7% males, 2.7% females; 5–9 in Waratah: 1.3% males, 2.2% females
- 0–4 in Rosebery: 0.8% males, 2.3% females; 0–4 in Waratah: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $535
- First area, 2016: $502
- First area, 2021: $524
- Second area, 2011: $389
- Second area, 2016: $377
- Second area, 2021: $432
- First area, 2011: $1,295
- First area, 2016: $1,227
- First area, 2021: $962
- Second area, 2011: $560
- Second area, 2016: $662
- Second area, 2021: $718
- First area, 2011: $1,476
- First area, 2016: $1,562
- First area, 2021: $1,285
- Second area, 2011: $933
- Second area, 2016: $850
- Second area, 2021: $955
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.3
- First area, 2016: 2.1
- First area, 2021: 1.9
- Second area, 2011: 2.1
- Second area, 2016: 1.9
- Second area, 2021: 2.1
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $110
- First area, 2016: $100
- First area, 2021: $150
- Second area, 2011: $123
- Second area, 2016: $130
- Second area, 2021: $245
- First area, 2011: $650
- First area, 2016: $531
- First area, 2021: $600
- Second area, 2011: $670
- Second area, 2016: $498
- Second area, 2021: $547
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.70
- First area, 2021: 0.70
- Second area, 2011: 1.10
- Second area, 2016: 0.70
- Second area, 2021: 0.70
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Rosebery with nearby areas
Compare Waratah with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Rosebery vs Waratah [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL60568/rosebery/vs/SAL60717/waratah