Compare
Ridgley vs Upper Natone
Suburb / Locality comparison ≈ 12 km apart · Ridgley profile · Upper Natone profile
Ridgley Upper Natone
Upper Natone and Ridgley are nearby Tasmanian areas with very different community profiles. Upper Natone is a smaller, older place where the typical resident is 49 and full-time employment is far higher at 71.7%. In contrast, Ridgley is more family-focused, with a younger typical age of 41 and a much higher share of people caring for children unpaid (30.5% compared to 12.6% in Upper Natone). Ridgley also offers more local infrastructure; it is mostly car-dependent but has better walkability than Upper Natone, which is described as car-dependent.
These two areas share a nearly identical proportion of First Nations people (8.1%) and have almost the same typical weekly household incomes, sitting around $1,500. Both are composed entirely of separate houses and have similar rental rates. While they share these core characteristics, the gap in local amenities remains wide, with Ridgley continuing to have far more shops and schools within walking distance than Upper Natone.
Where they differ most
Demographics & Identity
- First area, 2011: 746
- First area, 2016: 604
- First area, 2021: 645
- Second area, 2016: 112
- Second area, 2021: 111
- First area, 2011: 39 yrs
- First area, 2016: 43 yrs
- First area, 2021: 41 yrs
- Second area, 2016: 47 yrs
- Second area, 2021: 49 yrs
Age structure
Marital status
Age & sex structure
Bars show the share of each area's own population, so differently sized areas stay comparable.
- 85+ in Ridgley: 0.5% males, 0.0% females; 85+ in Upper Natone: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 80–84 in Ridgley: 1.4% males, 0.8% females; 80–84 in Upper Natone: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 75–79 in Ridgley: 2.5% males, 2.3% females; 75–79 in Upper Natone: 3.1% males, 0.0% females
- 70–74 in Ridgley: 3.1% males, 2.3% females; 70–74 in Upper Natone: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 65–69 in Ridgley: 3.1% males, 2.6% females; 65–69 in Upper Natone: 3.1% males, 4.1% females
- 60–64 in Ridgley: 4.3% males, 3.7% females; 60–64 in Upper Natone: 3.1% males, 4.1% females
- 55–59 in Ridgley: 2.9% males, 2.3% females; 55–59 in Upper Natone: 11.3% males, 3.1% females
- 50–54 in Ridgley: 3.1% males, 3.7% females; 50–54 in Upper Natone: 8.2% males, 3.1% females
- 45–49 in Ridgley: 4.8% males, 3.6% females; 45–49 in Upper Natone: 5.2% males, 9.3% females
- 40–44 in Ridgley: 1.9% males, 2.9% females; 40–44 in Upper Natone: 0.0% males, 4.1% females
- 35–39 in Ridgley: 2.9% males, 2.0% females; 35–39 in Upper Natone: 5.2% males, 0.0% females
- 30–34 in Ridgley: 2.8% males, 2.3% females; 30–34 in Upper Natone: 4.1% males, 6.2% females
- 25–29 in Ridgley: 3.2% males, 3.6% females; 25–29 in Upper Natone: 0.0% males, 3.1% females
- 20–24 in Ridgley: 4.0% males, 2.8% females; 20–24 in Upper Natone: 4.1% males, 3.1% females
- 15–19 in Ridgley: 4.5% males, 4.0% females; 15–19 in Upper Natone: 0.0% males, 0.0% females
- 10–14 in Ridgley: 2.8% males, 1.7% females; 10–14 in Upper Natone: 0.0% males, 3.1% females
- 5–9 in Ridgley: 2.9% males, 2.6% females; 5–9 in Upper Natone: 0.0% males, 5.2% females
- 0–4 in Ridgley: 3.6% males, 2.5% females; 0–4 in Upper Natone: 0.0% males, 4.1% females
Ancestry & Birthplace
Country of birth
Ancestry
Language
Language used at home
Religion
Religious affiliation
Education & Qualifications
Highest year of school
Highest qualification level
Field of qualification
Income
- First area, 2011: $435
- First area, 2016: $569
- First area, 2021: $646
- Second area, 2016: $495
- Second area, 2021: $700
- First area, 2011: $1,068
- First area, 2016: $1,233
- First area, 2021: $1,558
- Second area, 2016: $1,024
- Second area, 2021: $1,518
- First area, 2011: $1,280
- First area, 2016: $1,361
- First area, 2021: $1,836
- Second area, 2016: $1,145
- Second area, 2021: $1,724
Household income distribution
Personal income distribution
Health & Disability
Long-term health conditions reported
Number of long-term health conditions
Community Participation
First Nations
Family & Households
- First area, 2011: 2.7
- First area, 2016: 2.6
- First area, 2021: 2.7
- Second area, 2016: 2.4
- Second area, 2021: 2.3
Family composition
Household size
Housing & Dwellings
- First area, 2011: $183
- First area, 2016: $220
- First area, 2021: $230
- Second area, 2016: $195
- Second area, 2021: $235
- First area, 2011: $1,110
- First area, 2016: $1,160
- First area, 2021: $1,295
- Second area, 2016: $867
- Second area, 2021: $992
- First area, 2011: 1.10
- First area, 2016: 0.80
- First area, 2021: 0.80
- Second area, 2016: 0.90
- Second area, 2021: 0.80
How homes are owned or rented
Types of homes
Bedrooms per home
Weekly rent distribution
Monthly mortgage distribution
Transport & Vehicles
How people get to work
Motor vehicles per home
Migration & Movement
Jobs & Industry
Industries people work in
Occupations people work in
Walkability
Compare Ridgley with nearby areas
Compare Upper Natone with nearby areas
Cite this page
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Ridgley vs Upper Natone [Census of Population and Housing]. CensusAtlas, used under CC BY 4.0. https://censusatlas.au/compare/sal/SAL60553/ridgley/vs/SAL60708/upper-natone